Discussion:
W.W.I continued - Zionists fired the first shots of W.W.II
(too old to reply)
Jason P
2010-10-14 07:38:36 UTC
Permalink
The Jewish Declaration of War on Nazi Germany
The Economic Boycott of 1933

How Zionists fired the first shots of W.W.II

Article from The Barnes Review, Jan./Feb. 2001, pp. 41-45.
The Barnes Review, 645 Pennsylvania Ave SE, Suite 100, Washington D.C.
20003, USA.

By M. Raphael Johnson, Ph.D.


Long before the Hitler government began restricting the rights of the German
Jews, the leaders of the worldwide Jewish community formally declared war on
the "New Germany" at a time when the U.S. government and even the Jewish
leaders in Germany were urging caution in dealing with the new Hitler
regime.

The war by the international Jewish leadership on Germany not only sparked
definite reprisals by the German government but also set the stage for a
little-known economic and political alliance between the Hitler government
and the leaders of the Zionist movement who hoped that the tension between
the Germans and the Jews would lead to massive emigration to Palestine. In
short, the result was a tactical alliance between the Nazis and the founders
of the modern-day state of Israel - a fact that many today would prefer be
forgotten.

To this day, it is generally (although incorrectly) believed that when Adolf
Hitler was appointed German chancellor in January of 1933, the German
government began policies to suppress the Jews of Germany, including
rounding up of Jews and putting them in concentration camps and launching
campaigns of terror and violence against the domestic Jewish population.

While there were sporadic eruptions of violence against Jews in Germany
after Hitler came to power, this was not officially sanctioned or
encouraged. And the truth is that anti-Jewish sentiments in Germany (or
elsewhere in Europe) were actually nothing new. As all Jewish historians
attest with much fervor, anti-Semitic uprisings of various degrees had been
ever-present in European history.

In any case, in early 1933, Hitler was not the undisputed leader of Germany,
nor did he have full command of the armed forces. Hitler was a major figure
in a coalition government, but he was far from being the government himself.
That was the result of a process of consolidation which evolved later.

Even Germany's Jewish Central Association, known as the Verein, contested
the suggestion (made by some Jewish leaders outside Germany) that the new
government was deliberately provoking anti-Jewish uprisings.

The Verein issued a statement that "the responsible government authorities
[i.e. the Hitler regime] are unaware of the threatening situation," saying,
"we do not believe our German fellow citizens will let themselves be carried
away into committing excesses against the Jews."

Despite this, Jewish leaders in the United States and Britain determined on
their own that it was necessary to launch a war against the Hitler
government.

On March 12, 1933 the American Jewish Congress announced a massive protest
at Madison Square Gardens for March 27. At that time the commander in chief
of the Jewish War Veterans called for an American boycott of German goods.
In the meantime, on March 23, 20,000 Jews protested at New York's City Hall
as rallies were staged outside the North German Lloyd and Hamburg-American
shipping lines and boycotts were mounted against German goods throughout
shops and businesses in New York City.

According to The Daily Express of London of March 24, 1933, the Jews had
already launched their boycott against Germany and her elected government.
The headline read "Judea Declares War on Germany - Jews of All the World
Unite - Boycott of German Goods - Mass Demonstrations." The article
described a forthcoming "holy war" and went on to implore Jews everywhere to
boycott German goods and engage in mass demonstrations against German
economic interests.

--
"The whole of Israel throughout the world is uniting to declare an
economic and financial war on Germany. The appearance of the Swastika as the
symbol of the new Germany has revived the old war symbol of Judas to new
life. Fourteen million Jews scattered over the entire world are tight to
each other as if one man, in order to declare war against the German
persecutors of their fellow believers.

The Jewish wholesaler will quit his house, the banker his stock
exchange, the merchant his business, and the beggar his humble hut, in order
to join the holy war against Hitler's people."

--- Daily Express of London of March 24, 1933
--


The Express said that Germany was "now confronted with an international
boycott of its trade, its finances, and its industry.... In London, New
York, Paris and Warsaw, Jewish businessmen are united to go on an economic
crusade."

The article said "worldwide preparations are being made to organize protest
demonstrations," and reported that "the old and reunited nation of Israel
gets in formation with new and modern weapons to fight out its age old
battle against its persecutors."

This truly could be described as "the first shot fired in the Second World
War."

In a similar vein, the Jewish newspaper Natscha Retsch wrote:

--
"The war against Germany will be waged by all Jewish communities,
conferences, congresses... by every individual Jew. Thereby the war against
Germany will ideologically enliven and promote our interests, which require
that Germany be wholly destroyed.

The danger for us Jews lies in the whole German people, in Germany as
a whole as well as individually. It must be rendered harmless for all
time.... In this war we Jews have to participate, and this with all the
strength and might we have at our disposal."
--


...The Zionist Association of Germany put out a telegram on the 26th of
March rejecting many of the allegations made against the National Socialists
as "propaganda," "mendacious" and "sensational."

...The Zionist faction had every reason to ensure the permanence of National
Socialist ideology in Germany. Klaus Polkehn, writing in the Journal of
Palestine Studies ("The Secret Contacts: Zionism and Nazi Germany,
1933-1941"; JPS v. 3/4, spring/summer 1976), claims that the moderate
attitude of the Zionists was due to their vested interest in seeing the
financial victory of National Socialism to force immigration to Palestine.
This little-known factor would ultimately come to play a pivotal part in the
relationship between Nazi Germany and the Jews.

In the meantime, though, German Foreign Minister Konstantin von Neurath
complained of the "vilification campaign" and said:


--
"As concerns Jews, I can only say that their propagandists abroad are
rendering their co-religionists in Germany no service by giving the German
public, through their distorted and untruthful news about persecution and
torture of Jews, the impression that they actually halt at nothing, not even
at lies and calumny, to fight the present German government."
--


The fledgling Hitler government itself was clearly trying to contain the
growing tension - both within Germany and without. In the United States,
even U.S. Secretary of State Cordell Hull wired Rabbi Stephen Wise of the
American Jewish Congress and urged caution:

--
"Whereas there was for a short time considerable physical mistreatment of
Jews, this phase may be considered virtually terminated.... A stabilization
appears to have been reached in the field of personal mistreatment.... I
feel hopeful that the situation which has caused such widespread concern
throughout this country will soon revert to normal."
--

Despite all this, the leaders of the Jewish community refused to relent. On
March 27 there were simultaneous protest rallies at Madison Square Garden,
in Chicago, Boston, Philadelphia, Baltimore, Cleveland and 70 other
locations. The New York rally was broadcast worldwide. The bottom line is
that "the New Germany" was declared to be an enemy of Jewish interests and
thus needed to be economically strangled. This was before Hitler decided to
boycott Jewish goods.

It was in direct response to this that the German government announced a
one-day boycott of Jewish businesses in Germany on April 1. German
Propaganda Minister Dr. Joseph Goebbels announced that if, after the one-day
boycott, there were no further attacks on Germany, the boycott would be
stopped. Hitler himself responded to the Jewish boycott and the threats in a
speech on March 28 - four days after the original Jewish declaration of
war - saying:

--
"Now that the domestic enemies of the nation have been eliminated by the
Volk itself, what we have long been waiting for will not come to pass.

The Communist and Marxist criminals and their Jewish-intellectual
instigators, who, having made off with their capital stocks across the
border in the nick of time, are now unfolding an unscrupulous, treasonous
campaign of agitation against the German Volk as a whole from there....

Lies and slander of positively hair-raising perversity are being launched
about Germany. Horror stories of dismembered Jewish corpses, gouged out eyes
and hacked off hands are circulating for the purpose of defaming the German
Volk in the world for the second time, just as they had succeeded in doing
once before in 1914."
--


Thus, the fact - one conveniently left out of nearly all history on the
subject - is that Hitler's March 28, 1933 boycott order was in direct
response to the declaration of war on Germany by the worldwide Jewish
leadership just four days earlier. Today, Hitler's boycott order is
described as a naked act of aggression, yet the full circumstances leading
up to his order are seldom described in even the most ponderous and detailed
histories of "the Holocaust".

Not even Saul Friedlander in his otherwise comprehensive overview of German
policy, Nazi Germany and the Jews, mentions the fact that the Jewish
declaration of war and boycott preceded Hitler's speech of March 28, 1933.
Discerning readers would be wise to ask why Friedlander felt this item of
history so irrelevant.

The simple fact is that it was organized Jewry as a political entity - and
not even the German Jewish community per se - that actually initiated the
first shot in the war with Germany.

Germany's response was a defensive - not an offensive - measure. Were that
fact widely known today, it would cast new light on the subsequent events
that ultimately led to the world-wide conflagration that followed.

To understand Hitler's reaction to the Jewish declaration of war, it is
vital to understand the critical state of the German economy at the time. In
1933, the German economy was in a shambles. Some 3 million Germans were on
public assistance with a total of 6 million unemployed. Hyper-inflation had
destroyed the economic vitality of the German nation. Furthermore, the
anti-German propaganda pouring out of the global press strengthened the
resolve of Germany's enemies, especially the Poles and their hawkish
military high command.

The Jewish leaders were not bluffing. The boycott was an act of war not
solely in metaphor: it was a means, well crafted, to destroy Germany as a
political, social and economic entity. The long term purpose of the Jewish
boycott against Germany was to bankrupt her with respect to the reparation
payments imposed on Germany after World War I and to keep Germany
demilitarized and vulnerable.

The boycott, in fact, was quite crippling to Germany. Jewish scholars such
as Edwin Black have reported that, in response to the boycott, German
exports were cut by 10 percent, and that many were demanding seizing German
assets in foreign countries (Edwin Black, The Transfer Agreement - The
Untold Story of the Secret Pact between the Third Reich and Jewish
Palestine, New York, 1984).

The attacks on Germany did not cease. The worldwide Jewish leadership became
ever the more belligerent and worked itself into a frenzy. An International
Jewish Boycott Conference was held in Amsterdam to coordinate the ongoing
boycott campaign. It was held under the auspices of the self-styled World
Jewish Economic Federation, of which famous New York City attorney and
longtime political power broker, Samuel Untermyer, was elected president.

Upon returning to the United States in the wake of the conference, Untermyer
delivered a speech over WABC Radio (New York), a transcript of which was
printed in The New York Times on August 7, 1933.

Untermyer's inflammatory oratory called for a "sacred war" against Germany,
making the flat-out allegation that Germany was engaged in a plan to
"exterminate the Jews." He said (in part):


--
"...Germany [has] been converted from a nation of culture into a veritable
hell of cruel and savage beasts.

We owe it not only to our persecuted brethren but to the entire world to now
strike in self-defense a blow that will free humanity from a repetition of
this incredible outrage....

Now or never must all the nations of the earth make common cause against
the... slaughter, starvation and annihilation... fiendish torture, cruelty
and persecution that are being inflicted day by day upon these men, women
and children....

When the tale is told... the world will confront a picture so fearful in its
barbarous cruelty that the hell of war and the alleged Belgian atrocities
pale into insignificance as compared to this devilishly, deliberately,
cold-bloodedly planned and already partially executed campaign for the
extermination of a proud, gentle, loyal, law-abiding people...

The Jews are the aristocrats of the world. From time immemorial they have
been persecuted and have seen their persecutors come and go. They alone have
survived. And so will history repeat itself, but that furnishes no reason
why we should permit this reversion of a once great nation to the Dark Ages
or fail to rescue these 600,000 human souls from the tortures of hell....

...What we are proposing and have already gone far toward doing, is to
prosecute a purely defensive economic boycott that will undermine the Hitler
regime and bring the German people to their senses by destroying their
export trade on which their very existence depends.

...We propose to and are organizing world opinion to express itself in the
only way Germany can be made to understand...."
--


Untermyer then proceeded to provide his listeners with a wholly fraudulent
history of the circumstances of the German boycott and how it originated. He
also proclaimed that the Germans were bent on a plan to "exterminate the
Jews":


--
"The Hitler regime originated and are fiendishly prosecuting their boycott
to exterminate the Jews by placarding Jewish shops, warning Germans against
dealing with them, by imprisoning Jewish shopkeepers and parading them
through the streets by the hundreds under guard of Nazi troops for the sole
crime of being Jews, by ejecting them from the learned professions in which
many of them had attained eminence, by excluding their children from the
schools, their men from the labor unions, closing against them every avenue
of livelihood, locking them in vile concentration camps and starving and
torturing them without cause and resorting to every other conceivable form
of torture, inhuman beyond conception, until suicide has become their only
means of escape, and all solely because they are or their remote ancestors
were Jews, and all with the avowed object of exterminating them."
--


Untermyer concluded his largely fantastic and hysterical address by
declaring that with the support of "Christian friends... we will drive the
last nail in the coffin of bigotry and fanaticism...."

That his allegations against Germany were made long before even Jewish
historians today claim there were any gas chambers or even a plan to
"exterminate" the Jews, displays the nature of the propaganda campaign
confronting Germany.

However, during this same period there were some unusual developments at
work: The spring of 1933 also witnessed the beginning of a period of private
cooperation between the German government and the Zionist movement in
Germany and Palestine (and actually worldwide) to increase the flow of
German-Jewish immigrants and capital to Palestine.

The modern-day supporters of Zionist Israel and many historians have
succeeded in keeping this Nazi-Zionist pact a secret to the general public
for decades and while most Americans have no concept of the possibility that
there could have been outright collaboration between the Nazi leadership and
the founders of what became the state of Israel, the truth has begun to
emerge.

Dissident Jewish writer Lenni Brennar's Zionism In the Age of the Dictators,
published by a small press and not given the publicity it deserves by the
so-called "mainstream" media (which is otherwise obsessed with the Holocaust
era), was perhaps the first major endeavor in this realm.

In response to Brennar and others, the Zionist reaction has usually
consisted of declarations that their collaboration with Nazi Germany was
undertaken solely to save the lives of Jews. But the collaboration was all
the more remarkable because it took place at a time when many Jews and
Jewish organizations demanded a boycott of Germany.

To the Zionist leaders, Hitler's assumption of power held out the
possibility of a flow of immigrants to Palestine. Previously, the majority
of German Jews, who identified themselves as Germans, had little sympathy
with the Zionist cause of promoting the ingathering of world Jewry to
Palestine. But the Zionists saw that only the anti-Semitic Hitler was likely
to push the anti-Zionist German Jews into the arms of Zionism.

For all the modern-day wailing by worldwide supporters of Israel (not to
mention the Israelis themselves) about "the Holocaust", they neglect to
mention that making the situation in Germany as uncomfortable for the Jews
as possible - in cooperation with German National Socialism - was part of
the plan.

This was the genesis of the so-called Transfer Agreement, the agreement
between Zionist Jews and the National Socialist government to transfer
German Jewry to Palestine.

According to Jewish historian Walter Laqueur and many others, German Jews
were far from convinced that immigration to Palestine was the answer.
Furthermore, although the majority of German Jews refused to consider the
Zionists as their political leaders, it is clear that Hitler protected and
cooperated with the Zionists for the purposes of implementing the final
solution: the mass transfer of Jews to the Middle East.

Edwin Black, in his massive tome The Transfer Agreement (Macmillan, 1984),
stated that although most Jews did not want to flee to Palestine at all, due
to the Zionist movement's influence within Nazi Germany a Jew's best chance
of getting out of Germany was by emigrating to Palestine. In other words,
the Transfer Agreement itself mandated that Jewish capital could only to go
Palestine.

Thus, according to the Zionists, a Jew could leave Germany only if he went
to the Levant.

The primary difficulty with the Transfer Agreement (or even the idea of such
an agreement) was that the English [!!!; Scriptorium] were demanding, as a
condition of immigration, that each immigrant pay 1,000 pounds sterling upon
arrival in Haifa or elsewhere. The difficulty was that such hard currency
was nearly impossible to come by in a cash-strapped and radically
inflationary Germany. This was the main idea behind the final Transfer
Agreement. Laqueur writes:


--
"A large German bank would freeze funds paid in by immigrants in blocked
accounts for German exporters, while a bank in Palestine would control the
sale of German goods to Palestine, thereby providing the immigrants with the
necessary foreign currency on the spot. Sam Cohen, co-owner of Hanoaiah Ltd.
and initiator of the transfer endeavors, was however subjected to
long-lasting objections from his own people and finally had to concede that
such a transfer agreement could only be concluded on a much higher level
with a bank of its own rather than that of a private company. The renowned
Anglo-Palestine Bank in London would be included in this transfer deal and
create a trust company for [this] purpose."
--


Of course, this is of major historical importance in dealing with the
relationship between Zionism and National Socialism in Germany in the 1930s.
The relationship was not one merely of mutual interest and political
favoritism on the part of Hitler, but a close financial relationship with
German banking families and financial institutions as well. Black writes:


--
"It was one thing for the Zionists to subvert the anti-Nazi boycott.
Zionism needed to transfer out the capital of German Jews, and merchandise
was the only available medium. But soon Zionist leaders understood that the
success of the future Jewish Palestinian economy would be inextricably bound
up with the survival of the Nazi economy. So the Zionist leadership was
compelled to go further. The German economy would have to be safeguarded,
stabilized, and if necessary reinforced. Hence, the Nazi party and the
Zionist organizers shared a common stake in the recovery of Germany."
--

Thus one sees a radical fissure in world Jewry around 1933 and beyond.
There were, first, the non-Zionist Jews (specifically the World Jewish
Congress founded in 1933), who, on the one hand, demanded the boycott and
eventual destruction of Germany. Black notes that many of these people were
not just in New York and Amsterdam, but a major source for this also came
from Palestine proper.

On the other hand, one can see the judicious use of such feelings by the
Zionists for the sake of eventual resettlement in Palestine. In other words,
it can be said (and Black does hint at this) that Zionism believed that,
since Jews would be moving to the Levant, capital flight would be necessary
for any new economy to function.

The result was the understanding that Zionism would have to ally itself
with National Socialism, so that the German government would not impede the
flow of Jewish capital out of the country.

It served the Zionist interests at the time that Jews be loud in their
denunciations of German practices against the Jews to scare them into the
Levant, but, on the other hand, Laqueur states that "The Zionists became
motivated not to jeopardize the German economy or currency." In other words,
the Zionist leadership of the Jewish Diaspora was one of subterfuge and
underhandedness, with only the advent of German hostility towards Jewry
convincing the world's Jews that immigration was the only escape.

The fact is that the ultimate establishment of the state of Israel was
based on fraud. The Zionists did not represent anything more than a small
minority of German Jews in 1933.

On the one hand, the Zionist fathers of Israel wanted loud denunciations
of Germany's "cruelties" to the world's Jews while at the same time
demanding moderation so that the National Socialist government would remain
stable, financially and politically. Thus Zionism boycotted the boycott.

For all intents and purposes, the National Socialist government was the
best thing to happen to Zionism in its history, for it "proved" to many Jews
that Europeans were irredeemably anti-Jewish and that Palestine was the only
answer: Zionism came to represent the overwhelming majority of Jews solely
by trickery and cooperation with Adolf Hitler.

For the Zionists, both the denunciations of German policies towards Jews
(to keep Jews frightened), plus the reinvigoration of the German economy
(for the sake of final resettlement) was imperative for the Zionist
movement. Ironically, today the Zionist leaders of Israel complain bitterly
about the horrific and inhuman regime of the National Socialists. So the
fraud continues.


--- The Barnes Review, 645 Pennsylvania Ave SE, Suite 100, Washington
D.C. 20003, USA.
--
I Like the Truth....

"Why Johnny Ringo! I'll be your 'huckleberry...' say when...!"
-Doc Holiday (in movie "Tombstone") to cowboy-outlaw Johnny Ringo
--
Force, no matter how concealed, begets resistance. - Lakota Sioux proverb
Listening to a liar is like drinking warm water. - Native American Unknown
A brave man dies but once, a coward many times. - Native American Unknown
--
They deem him their worst enemy who tells them the truth.
-Plato
--
"I've earned everything I've got."
- Richard M. Nixon
Joe Bruno
2010-10-14 08:05:15 UTC
Permalink
Post by Jason P
The Jewish Declaration of War on Nazi Germany
    The Economic Boycott of 1933
How Zionists fired the first shots of W.W.II
Article from The Barnes Review, Jan./Feb. 2001, pp. 41-45.
The Barnes Review, 645 Pennsylvania Ave SE, Suite 100, Washington D.C.
20003, USA.
By M. Raphael Johnson, Ph.D.
Long before the Hitler government began restricting the rights of the German
Jews, the leaders of the worldwide Jewish community formally declared war on
the "New Germany" at a time when the U.S. government and even the Jewish
leaders in Germany were urging caution in dealing with the new Hitler
regime.
The war by the international Jewish leadership on Germany not only sparked
definite reprisals by the German government but also set the stage for a
little-known economic and political alliance between the Hitler government
and the leaders of the Zionist movement who hoped that the tension between
the Germans and the Jews would lead to massive emigration to Palestine. In
short, the result was a tactical alliance between the Nazis and the founders
of the modern-day state of Israel - a fact that many today would prefer be
forgotten.
To this day, it is generally (although incorrectly) believed that when Adolf
Hitler was appointed German chancellor in January of 1933, the German
government began policies to suppress the Jews of Germany, including
rounding up of Jews and putting them in concentration camps and launching
campaigns of terror and violence against the domestic Jewish population.
While there were sporadic eruptions of violence against Jews in Germany
after Hitler came to power, this was not officially sanctioned or
encouraged. And the truth is that anti-Jewish sentiments in Germany (or
elsewhere in Europe) were actually nothing new. As all Jewish historians
attest with much fervor, anti-Semitic uprisings of various degrees had been
ever-present in European history.
In any case, in early 1933, Hitler was not the undisputed leader of Germany,
nor did he have full command of the armed forces. Hitler was a major figure
in a coalition government, but he was far from being the government himself.
That was the result of a process of consolidation which evolved later.
Even Germany's Jewish Central Association, known as the Verein, contested
the suggestion (made by some Jewish leaders outside Germany) that the new
government was deliberately provoking anti-Jewish uprisings.
The Verein issued a statement that "the responsible government authorities
[i.e. the Hitler regime] are unaware of the threatening situation," saying,
"we do not believe our German fellow citizens will let themselves be carried
away into committing excesses against the Jews."
Despite this, Jewish leaders in the United States and Britain determined on
their own that it was necessary to launch a war against the Hitler
government.
On March 12, 1933 the American Jewish Congress announced a massive protest
at Madison Square Gardens for March 27. At that time the commander in chief
of the Jewish War Veterans called for an American boycott of German goods.
In the meantime, on March 23, 20,000 Jews protested at New York's City Hall
as rallies were staged outside the North German Lloyd and Hamburg-American
shipping lines and boycotts were mounted against German goods throughout
shops and businesses in New York City.
According to The Daily Express of London of March 24, 1933, the Jews had
already launched their boycott against Germany and her elected government.
The headline read "Judea Declares War on Germany - Jews of All the World
Unite - Boycott of German Goods - Mass Demonstrations." The article
described a forthcoming "holy war" and went on to implore Jews everywhere to
boycott German goods and engage in mass demonstrations against German
economic interests.
--
"The whole of Israel throughout the world is uniting to declare an
economic and financial war on Germany. The appearance of the Swastika as the
symbol of the new Germany has revived the old war symbol of Judas to new
life. Fourteen million Jews scattered over the entire world are tight to
each other as if one man, in order to declare war against the German
persecutors of their fellow believers.
The Jewish wholesaler will quit his house, the banker his stock
exchange, the merchant his business, and the beggar his humble hut, in order
to join the holy war against Hitler's people."
    --- Daily Express of London of March 24, 1933
--
The Express said that Germany was "now confronted with an international
boycott of its trade, its finances, and its industry.... In London, New
York, Paris and Warsaw, Jewish businessmen are united to go on an economic
crusade."
The article said "worldwide preparations are being made to organize protest
demonstrations," and reported that "the old and reunited nation of Israel
gets in formation with new and modern weapons to fight out its age old
battle against its persecutors."
This truly could be described as "the first shot fired in the Second World
War."
--
"The war against Germany will be waged by all Jewish communities,
conferences, congresses... by every individual Jew. Thereby the war against
Germany will ideologically enliven and promote our interests, which require
that Germany be wholly destroyed.
The danger for us Jews lies in the whole German people, in Germany as
a whole as well as individually. It must be rendered harmless for all
time.... In this war we Jews have to participate, and this with all the
strength and might we have at our disposal."
--
...The Zionist Association of Germany put out a telegram on the 26th of
March rejecting many of the allegations made against the National Socialists
as "propaganda," "mendacious" and "sensational."
...The Zionist faction had every reason to ensure the permanence of National
Socialist ideology in Germany. Klaus Polkehn, writing in the Journal of
Palestine Studies ("The Secret Contacts: Zionism and Nazi Germany,
1933-1941"; JPS v. 3/4, spring/summer 1976), claims that the moderate
attitude of the Zionists was due to their vested interest in seeing the
financial victory of National Socialism to force immigration to Palestine.
This little-known factor would ultimately come to play a pivotal part in the
relationship between Nazi Germany and the Jews.
In the meantime, though, German Foreign Minister Konstantin von Neurath
--
"As concerns Jews, I can only say that their propagandists abroad are
rendering their co-religionists in Germany no service by giving the German
public, through their distorted and untruthful news about persecution and
torture of Jews, the impression that they actually halt at nothing, not even
at lies and calumny, to fight the present German government."
--
The fledgling Hitler government itself was clearly trying to contain the
growing tension - both within Germany and without. In the United States,
even U.S. Secretary of State Cordell Hull wired Rabbi Stephen Wise of the
--
"Whereas there was for a short time considerable physical mistreatment of
Jews, this phase may be considered virtually terminated.... A stabilization
appears to have been reached in the field of personal mistreatment.... I
feel hopeful that the situation which has caused such widespread concern
throughout this country will soon revert to normal."
--
Despite all this, the leaders of the Jewish community refused to relent. On
March 27 there were simultaneous protest rallies at Madison Square Garden,
in Chicago, Boston, Philadelphia, Baltimore, Cleveland and 70 other
locations. The New York rally was broadcast worldwide. The bottom line is
that "the New Germany" was declared to be an enemy of Jewish interests and
thus needed to be economically strangled. This was before Hitler decided to
boycott Jewish goods.
It was in direct response to this that the German government announced a
one-day boycott of Jewish businesses in Germany on April 1. German
Propaganda Minister Dr. Joseph Goebbels announced that if, after the one-day
boycott, there were no further attacks on Germany, the boycott would be
stopped. Hitler himself responded to the Jewish boycott and the threats in a
speech on March 28 - four days after the original Jewish declaration of
--
"Now that the domestic enemies of the nation have been eliminated by the
Volk itself, what we have long been waiting for will not come to pass.
The Communist and Marxist criminals and their Jewish-intellectual
instigators, who, having made off with their capital stocks across the
border in the nick of time, are now unfolding an unscrupulous, treasonous
campaign of agitation against the German Volk as a whole from there....
Lies and slander of positively hair-raising perversity are being launched
about Germany. Horror stories of dismembered Jewish corpses, gouged out eyes
and hacked off hands are circulating for the purpose of defaming the German
Volk in the world for the second time, just as they had succeeded in doing
once before in 1914."
--
Thus, the fact - one conveniently left out of nearly all history on the
subject - is that Hitler's March 28, 1933 boycott order was in direct
response to the declaration of war on Germany by the worldwide Jewish
leadership just four days earlier. Today, Hitler's boycott order is
described as a naked act of aggression, yet the full circumstances leading
up to his order are seldom described in even the most ponderous and detailed
histories of "the Holocaust".
Not even Saul Friedlander in his otherwise comprehensive overview of German
policy, Nazi Germany and the Jews, mentions the fact that the Jewish
declaration of war and boycott preceded Hitler's speech of March 28, 1933.
Discerning readers would be wise to ask why Friedlander felt this item of
history so irrelevant.
The simple fact is that it was organized Jewry as a political entity - and
not even the German Jewish community per se - that actually initiated the
first shot in the war with Germany.
Germany's response was a defensive - not an offensive - measure. Were that
fact widely known today, it would cast new light on the subsequent events
that ultimately led to the world-wide conflagration that followed.
To understand Hitler's reaction to the Jewish declaration of war, it is
vital to understand the critical state of the German economy at the time. In
1933, the German economy was in a shambles. Some 3 million Germans were on
public assistance with a total of 6 million unemployed. Hyper-inflation had
destroyed the economic vitality of the German nation. Furthermore, the
anti-German propaganda pouring out of the global press strengthened the
resolve of Germany's enemies, especially the Poles and their hawkish
military high command.
The Jewish leaders were not bluffing. The boycott was an act of war not
solely in metaphor: it was a means, well crafted, to destroy Germany as a
political, social and economic entity. The long term purpose of the Jewish
boycott against Germany was to bankrupt her with respect to the reparation
payments imposed on Germany after World War I and to keep Germany
demilitarized and vulnerable.
The boycott, in fact, was quite crippling to Germany. Jewish scholars such
as Edwin Black have reported that, in response to the boycott, German
exports were cut by 10 percent, and that many were demanding seizing German
assets in foreign countries (Edwin Black, The Transfer Agreement - The
Untold Story of the Secret Pact between the Third Reich and Jewish
Palestine, New York, 1984).
The attacks on Germany did not cease. The worldwide Jewish leadership became
ever the more belligerent and worked itself into a frenzy. An International
Jewish Boycott Conference was held in Amsterdam to coordinate the ongoing
boycott campaign. It was held under the auspices of the self-styled World
Jewish Economic Federation, of which famous New York City attorney and
longtime political power broker, Samuel Untermyer, was elected president.
Upon returning to the United States in the wake of the conference, Untermyer
delivered a speech over WABC Radio (New York), a transcript of which was
printed in The New York Times on August 7, 1933.
Untermyer's inflammatory oratory called for a "sacred war" against Germany,
making the flat-out allegation that Germany was engaged in a plan to
--
"...Germany [has] been converted from a nation of culture into a veritable
hell of cruel and savage beasts.
We owe it not only to our persecuted brethren but to the entire world to now
strike in self-defense a blow that will free humanity from a repetition of
this incredible outrage....
Now or never must all the nations of the earth make common cause against
the... slaughter, starvation and annihilation... fiendish torture, cruelty
and persecution that are being inflicted day by day upon these men, women
and children....
When the tale is told... the world will confront a picture so fearful in its
barbarous cruelty that the hell of war and the alleged Belgian atrocities
pale into insignificance as compared to this devilishly, deliberately,
cold-bloodedly planned and already partially executed campaign for the
extermination of a proud, gentle, loyal, law-abiding people...
The Jews are the aristocrats of the world. From time immemorial they have
been persecuted and have seen their persecutors come and go. They alone have
survived. And so will history repeat itself, but that furnishes no reason
why we should permit this reversion of a once great nation to the Dark Ages
or fail to rescue these 600,000 human souls from the tortures of hell....
...What we are proposing and have already gone far toward doing, is to
prosecute a purely defensive economic boycott that will undermine the Hitler
regime and bring the German people to their senses by destroying their
export trade on which their very existence depends.
...We propose to and are organizing world opinion to express itself in the
only way Germany can be made to understand...."
--
Untermyer then proceeded to provide his listeners with a wholly fraudulent
history of the circumstances of the German boycott and how it originated. He
also proclaimed that the Germans were bent on a plan to "exterminate the
--
"The Hitler regime originated and are fiendishly prosecuting their boycott
to exterminate the Jews by placarding Jewish shops, warning Germans against
dealing with them, by imprisoning Jewish shopkeepers and parading them
through the streets by the hundreds under guard of Nazi troops for the sole
crime of being Jews, by ejecting them from the learned professions in which
many of them had attained eminence, by excluding their children from the
schools, their men from the labor unions, closing against them every avenue
of livelihood, locking them in vile concentration camps and starving and
torturing them without cause and resorting to every other conceivable form
of torture, inhuman beyond conception, until suicide has become their only
means of escape, and all solely because they are or their remote ancestors
were Jews, and all with the avowed object of exterminating them."
--
Untermyer concluded his largely fantastic and hysterical address by
declaring that with the support of "Christian friends... we will drive the
last nail in the coffin of bigotry and fanaticism...."
That his allegations against Germany were made long before even Jewish
historians today claim there were any gas chambers or even a plan to
"exterminate" the Jews, displays the nature of the propaganda campaign
confronting Germany.
However, during this same period there were some unusual developments at
work: The spring of 1933 also witnessed the beginning of a period of private
cooperation between the German government and the Zionist movement in
Germany and Palestine (and actually worldwide) to increase the flow of
German-Jewish immigrants and capital to Palestine.
The modern-day supporters of Zionist Israel and many historians have
succeeded in keeping this Nazi-Zionist pact a secret to the general public
for decades and while most Americans have no concept of the possibility that
there could have been outright collaboration between the Nazi leadership and
the founders of what became the state of Israel, the truth has begun to
emerge.
Dissident Jewish writer Lenni Brennar's Zionism In the Age of the Dictators,
published by a small press and not given the publicity it deserves by the
so-called "mainstream" media (which is otherwise obsessed with the Holocaust
era), was perhaps the first major endeavor in this realm.
In response to Brennar and others, the Zionist reaction has usually
consisted of declarations that their collaboration with Nazi Germany was
undertaken solely to save the lives of Jews. But the collaboration was all
the more remarkable because it took place at a time when many Jews and
Jewish organizations demanded a boycott of Germany.
To the Zionist leaders, Hitler's assumption of power held out the
possibility of a flow of immigrants to Palestine. Previously, the majority
of German Jews, who identified themselves as Germans, had little sympathy
with the Zionist cause of promoting the ingathering of world Jewry to
Palestine. But the Zionists saw that only the anti-Semitic Hitler was likely
to push the anti-Zionist German Jews into the arms of Zionism.
For all the modern-day wailing by worldwide supporters of Israel (not to
mention the Israelis themselves) about "the Holocaust", they neglect to
mention that making the situation in Germany as uncomfortable for the Jews
as possible - in cooperation with German National Socialism - was part of
the plan.
This was the genesis of the so-called Transfer Agreement, the agreement
between Zionist Jews and the National Socialist government to transfer
German Jewry to Palestine.
According to Jewish historian Walter Laqueur and many others, German Jews
were far from convinced that immigration to Palestine was the answer.
Furthermore, although the majority of German Jews refused to consider the
Zionists as their political leaders, it is clear that Hitler protected and
cooperated with the Zionists for the purposes of implementing the final
solution: the mass transfer of Jews to the Middle East.
Edwin Black, in his massive tome The Transfer Agreement (Macmillan, 1984),
stated that although most Jews did not want to flee to Palestine at all, due
to the Zionist movement's influence within Nazi Germany a Jew's best chance
of getting out of Germany was by emigrating to Palestine. In other words,
the Transfer Agreement itself mandated that Jewish capital could only to go
Palestine.
Thus, according to the Zionists, a Jew could leave Germany only if he went
to the Levant.
The primary difficulty with the Transfer Agreement (or even the idea of such
an agreement) was that the English [!!!; Scriptorium] were demanding, as a
condition of immigration, that each immigrant pay 1,000 pounds sterling upon
arrival in Haifa or elsewhere. The difficulty was that such hard currency
was nearly impossible to come by in a cash-strapped and radically
inflationary Germany. This was the main idea behind the final Transfer
--
"A large German bank would freeze funds paid in by immigrants in blocked
accounts for German exporters, while a bank in Palestine would control the
sale of German goods to Palestine, thereby providing the immigrants with the
necessary foreign currency on the spot. Sam Cohen, co-owner of Hanoaiah Ltd.
and initiator of the transfer endeavors, was however subjected to
long-lasting objections from his own people and finally had to concede that
such a transfer agreement could only be concluded on a much higher level
with a bank of its own rather than that of a private company. The renowned
Anglo-Palestine Bank in London would be included in this transfer deal and
create a trust company for [this] purpose."
--
Of course, this is of major historical importance in dealing with the
relationship between Zionism and National Socialism in Germany in the 1930s.
The relationship was not one merely of mutual interest and political
favoritism on the part of Hitler, but a close financial relationship with
--
"It was one thing for the Zionists to subvert the anti-Nazi boycott.
Zionism needed to transfer out the capital of German Jews, and merchandise
was the only available medium. But soon Zionist leaders understood that the
success of the future Jewish Palestinian economy would be inextricably bound
up with the survival of the Nazi economy. So the Zionist leadership was
compelled to go further. The German economy would have to be safeguarded,
stabilized, and if necessary reinforced. Hence, the Nazi party and the
Zionist organizers shared a common stake in the recovery of Germany."
--
Thus one sees a radical fissure in world Jewry around 1933 and beyond.
There were, first, the non-Zionist Jews (specifically the World Jewish
Congress founded in 1933), who, on the one hand, demanded the boycott and
eventual destruction of Germany. Black notes that many of these people were
not just in New York and Amsterdam, but a major source for this also came
from Palestine proper.
On the other hand, one can see the judicious use of such feelings by the
Zionists for the sake of eventual resettlement in Palestine. In other words,
it can be said (and Black does hint at this) that Zionism believed that,
since Jews would be moving to the Levant, capital flight would be necessary
for any new economy to function.
The result was the understanding that Zionism would have to ally itself
with National Socialism, so that the German government would not impede the
flow of Jewish capital out of the country.
It served the Zionist interests at the time that Jews be loud in their
denunciations of German practices against the Jews to scare them into the
Levant, but, on the other hand, Laqueur states that "The Zionists became
motivated not to jeopardize the German economy or currency." In other words,
the Zionist leadership of the Jewish Diaspora was one of subterfuge and
underhandedness, with only the advent of German hostility towards Jewry
convincing the world's Jews that immigration was the only escape.
The fact is that the ultimate establishment of the state of Israel was
based on fraud. The Zionists did not represent anything more than a small
minority of German Jews in 1933.
On the one hand, the Zionist fathers of Israel wanted loud denunciations
of Germany's "cruelties" to the world's Jews while at the same time
demanding moderation so that the National Socialist government would remain
stable, financially and politically. Thus Zionism boycotted the boycott.
For all intents and purposes, the National Socialist government was the
best thing to happen to Zionism in its history, for it "proved" to many Jews
that Europeans were irredeemably anti-Jewish and that Palestine was the only
answer: Zionism came to represent the overwhelming majority of Jews solely
by trickery and cooperation with Adolf Hitler.
 For the Zionists, both the denunciations of German policies towards Jews
(to keep Jews frightened), plus the reinvigoration of the German economy
(for the sake of final resettlement) was imperative for the Zionist
movement. Ironically, today the Zionist leaders of Israel complain bitterly
about the horrific and inhuman regime of the National Socialists. So the
fraud continues.
    ---  The Barnes Review, 645 Pennsylvania Ave SE, Suite 100, Washington
                D.C. 20003, USA.
--
I Like the Truth....
"Why Johnny Ringo! I'll be your 'huckleberry...' say when...!"
    -Doc Holiday (in movie "Tombstone") to cowboy-outlaw Johnny Ringo
--
Force, no matter how concealed, begets resistance. - Lakota Sioux proverb
Listening to a liar is like drinking warm water. - Native American Unknown
A brave man dies but once, a coward many times. - Native American Unknown
--
They deem him their worst enemy who tells them the truth.
-Plato
--
"I've earned everything I've got."
 - Richard M. Nixon
It was a boycott, not a war. Boycotts are used as mechanisms of
protest. Jews were being persecuted in Nazi Germany and people have a
right to buy their goods from anyone they choose.

Get it now????
Jason P
2010-10-14 15:39:56 UTC
Permalink
Post by Jason P
The Jewish Declaration of War on Nazi Germany
The Economic Boycott of 1933
How Zionists fired the first shots of W.W.II
Article from The Barnes Review, Jan./Feb. 2001, pp. 41-45.
The Barnes Review, 645 Pennsylvania Ave SE, Suite 100, Washington D.C.
20003, USA.
By M. Raphael Johnson, Ph.D.
Long before the Hitler government began restricting the rights of the German
Jews, the leaders of the worldwide Jewish community formally declared war on
the "New Germany" at a time when the U.S. government and even the Jewish
leaders in Germany were urging caution in dealing with the new Hitler
regime.
The war by the international Jewish leadership on Germany not only sparked
definite reprisals by the German government but also set the stage for a
little-known economic and political alliance between the Hitler government
and the leaders of the Zionist movement who hoped that the tension between
the Germans and the Jews would lead to massive emigration to Palestine. In
short, the result was a tactical alliance between the Nazis and the founders
of the modern-day state of Israel - a fact that many today would prefer be
forgotten.
To this day, it is generally (although incorrectly) believed that when Adolf
Hitler was appointed German chancellor in January of 1933, the German
government began policies to suppress the Jews of Germany, including
rounding up of Jews and putting them in concentration camps and launching
campaigns of terror and violence against the domestic Jewish population.
While there were sporadic eruptions of violence against Jews in Germany
after Hitler came to power, this was not officially sanctioned or
encouraged. And the truth is that anti-Jewish sentiments in Germany (or
elsewhere in Europe) were actually nothing new. As all Jewish historians
attest with much fervor, anti-Semitic uprisings of various degrees had been
ever-present in European history.
In any case, in early 1933, Hitler was not the undisputed leader of Germany,
nor did he have full command of the armed forces. Hitler was a major figure
in a coalition government, but he was far from being the government himself.
That was the result of a process of consolidation which evolved later.
Even Germany's Jewish Central Association, known as the Verein, contested
the suggestion (made by some Jewish leaders outside Germany) that the new
government was deliberately provoking anti-Jewish uprisings.
The Verein issued a statement that "the responsible government authorities
[i.e. the Hitler regime] are unaware of the threatening situation," saying,
"we do not believe our German fellow citizens will let themselves be carried
away into committing excesses against the Jews."
Despite this, Jewish leaders in the United States and Britain determined on
their own that it was necessary to launch a war against the Hitler
government.
On March 12, 1933 the American Jewish Congress announced a massive protest
at Madison Square Gardens for March 27. At that time the commander in chief
of the Jewish War Veterans called for an American boycott of German goods.
In the meantime, on March 23, 20,000 Jews protested at New York's City Hall
as rallies were staged outside the North German Lloyd and Hamburg-American
shipping lines and boycotts were mounted against German goods throughout
shops and businesses in New York City.
According to The Daily Express of London of March 24, 1933, the Jews had
already launched their boycott against Germany and her elected government.
The headline read "Judea Declares War on Germany - Jews of All the World
Unite - Boycott of German Goods - Mass Demonstrations." The article
described a forthcoming "holy war" and went on to implore Jews everywhere to
boycott German goods and engage in mass demonstrations against German
economic interests.
--
"The whole of Israel throughout the world is uniting to declare an
economic and financial war on Germany. The appearance of the Swastika as the
symbol of the new Germany has revived the old war symbol of Judas to new
life. Fourteen million Jews scattered over the entire world are tight to
each other as if one man, in order to declare war against the German
persecutors of their fellow believers.
The Jewish wholesaler will quit his house, the banker his stock
exchange, the merchant his business, and the beggar his humble hut, in order
to join the holy war against Hitler's people."
--- Daily Express of London of March 24, 1933
--
The Express said that Germany was "now confronted with an international
boycott of its trade, its finances, and its industry.... In London, New
York, Paris and Warsaw, Jewish businessmen are united to go on an economic
crusade."
The article said "worldwide preparations are being made to organize protest
demonstrations," and reported that "the old and reunited nation of Israel
gets in formation with new and modern weapons to fight out its age old
battle against its persecutors."
This truly could be described as "the first shot fired in the Second World
War."
--
"The war against Germany will be waged by all Jewish communities,
conferences, congresses... by every individual Jew. Thereby the war against
Germany will ideologically enliven and promote our interests, which require
that Germany be wholly destroyed.
The danger for us Jews lies in the whole German people, in Germany as
a whole as well as individually. It must be rendered harmless for all
time.... In this war we Jews have to participate, and this with all the
strength and might we have at our disposal."
--
...The Zionist Association of Germany put out a telegram on the 26th of
March rejecting many of the allegations made against the National Socialists
as "propaganda," "mendacious" and "sensational."
...The Zionist faction had every reason to ensure the permanence of National
Socialist ideology in Germany. Klaus Polkehn, writing in the Journal of
Palestine Studies ("The Secret Contacts: Zionism and Nazi Germany,
1933-1941"; JPS v. 3/4, spring/summer 1976), claims that the moderate
attitude of the Zionists was due to their vested interest in seeing the
financial victory of National Socialism to force immigration to Palestine.
This little-known factor would ultimately come to play a pivotal part in the
relationship between Nazi Germany and the Jews.
In the meantime, though, German Foreign Minister Konstantin von Neurath
--
"As concerns Jews, I can only say that their propagandists abroad are
rendering their co-religionists in Germany no service by giving the German
public, through their distorted and untruthful news about persecution and
torture of Jews, the impression that they actually halt at nothing, not even
at lies and calumny, to fight the present German government."
--
The fledgling Hitler government itself was clearly trying to contain the
growing tension - both within Germany and without. In the United States,
even U.S. Secretary of State Cordell Hull wired Rabbi Stephen Wise of the
--
"Whereas there was for a short time considerable physical mistreatment of
Jews, this phase may be considered virtually terminated.... A
stabilization
appears to have been reached in the field of personal mistreatment.... I
feel hopeful that the situation which has caused such widespread concern
throughout this country will soon revert to normal."
--
Despite all this, the leaders of the Jewish community refused to relent. On
March 27 there were simultaneous protest rallies at Madison Square Garden,
in Chicago, Boston, Philadelphia, Baltimore, Cleveland and 70 other
locations. The New York rally was broadcast worldwide. The bottom line is
that "the New Germany" was declared to be an enemy of Jewish interests and
thus needed to be economically strangled. This was before Hitler decided to
boycott Jewish goods.
It was in direct response to this that the German government announced a
one-day boycott of Jewish businesses in Germany on April 1. German
Propaganda Minister Dr. Joseph Goebbels announced that if, after the one-day
boycott, there were no further attacks on Germany, the boycott would be
stopped. Hitler himself responded to the Jewish boycott and the threats in a
speech on March 28 - four days after the original Jewish declaration of
--
"Now that the domestic enemies of the nation have been eliminated by the
Volk itself, what we have long been waiting for will not come to pass.
The Communist and Marxist criminals and their Jewish-intellectual
instigators, who, having made off with their capital stocks across the
border in the nick of time, are now unfolding an unscrupulous, treasonous
campaign of agitation against the German Volk as a whole from there....
Lies and slander of positively hair-raising perversity are being launched
about Germany. Horror stories of dismembered Jewish corpses, gouged out eyes
and hacked off hands are circulating for the purpose of defaming the German
Volk in the world for the second time, just as they had succeeded in doing
once before in 1914."
--
Thus, the fact - one conveniently left out of nearly all history on the
subject - is that Hitler's March 28, 1933 boycott order was in direct
response to the declaration of war on Germany by the worldwide Jewish
leadership just four days earlier. Today, Hitler's boycott order is
described as a naked act of aggression, yet the full circumstances leading
up to his order are seldom described in even the most ponderous and detailed
histories of "the Holocaust".
Not even Saul Friedlander in his otherwise comprehensive overview of German
policy, Nazi Germany and the Jews, mentions the fact that the Jewish
declaration of war and boycott preceded Hitler's speech of March 28, 1933.
Discerning readers would be wise to ask why Friedlander felt this item of
history so irrelevant.
The simple fact is that it was organized Jewry as a political entity - and
not even the German Jewish community per se - that actually initiated the
first shot in the war with Germany.
Germany's response was a defensive - not an offensive - measure. Were that
fact widely known today, it would cast new light on the subsequent events
that ultimately led to the world-wide conflagration that followed.
To understand Hitler's reaction to the Jewish declaration of war, it is
vital to understand the critical state of the German economy at the time. In
1933, the German economy was in a shambles. Some 3 million Germans were on
public assistance with a total of 6 million unemployed. Hyper-inflation had
destroyed the economic vitality of the German nation. Furthermore, the
anti-German propaganda pouring out of the global press strengthened the
resolve of Germany's enemies, especially the Poles and their hawkish
military high command.
The Jewish leaders were not bluffing. The boycott was an act of war not
solely in metaphor: it was a means, well crafted, to destroy Germany as a
political, social and economic entity. The long term purpose of the Jewish
boycott against Germany was to bankrupt her with respect to the reparation
payments imposed on Germany after World War I and to keep Germany
demilitarized and vulnerable.
The boycott, in fact, was quite crippling to Germany. Jewish scholars such
as Edwin Black have reported that, in response to the boycott, German
exports were cut by 10 percent, and that many were demanding seizing German
assets in foreign countries (Edwin Black, The Transfer Agreement - The
Untold Story of the Secret Pact between the Third Reich and Jewish
Palestine, New York, 1984).
The attacks on Germany did not cease. The worldwide Jewish leadership became
ever the more belligerent and worked itself into a frenzy. An
International
Jewish Boycott Conference was held in Amsterdam to coordinate the ongoing
boycott campaign. It was held under the auspices of the self-styled World
Jewish Economic Federation, of which famous New York City attorney and
longtime political power broker, Samuel Untermyer, was elected president.
Upon returning to the United States in the wake of the conference, Untermyer
delivered a speech over WABC Radio (New York), a transcript of which was
printed in The New York Times on August 7, 1933.
Untermyer's inflammatory oratory called for a "sacred war" against Germany,
making the flat-out allegation that Germany was engaged in a plan to
--
"...Germany [has] been converted from a nation of culture into a veritable
hell of cruel and savage beasts.
We owe it not only to our persecuted brethren but to the entire world to now
strike in self-defense a blow that will free humanity from a repetition of
this incredible outrage....
Now or never must all the nations of the earth make common cause against
the... slaughter, starvation and annihilation... fiendish torture, cruelty
and persecution that are being inflicted day by day upon these men, women
and children....
When the tale is told... the world will confront a picture so fearful in its
barbarous cruelty that the hell of war and the alleged Belgian atrocities
pale into insignificance as compared to this devilishly, deliberately,
cold-bloodedly planned and already partially executed campaign for the
extermination of a proud, gentle, loyal, law-abiding people...
The Jews are the aristocrats of the world. From time immemorial they have
been persecuted and have seen their persecutors come and go. They alone have
survived. And so will history repeat itself, but that furnishes no reason
why we should permit this reversion of a once great nation to the Dark Ages
or fail to rescue these 600,000 human souls from the tortures of hell....
...What we are proposing and have already gone far toward doing, is to
prosecute a purely defensive economic boycott that will undermine the Hitler
regime and bring the German people to their senses by destroying their
export trade on which their very existence depends.
...We propose to and are organizing world opinion to express itself in the
only way Germany can be made to understand...."
--
Untermyer then proceeded to provide his listeners with a wholly fraudulent
history of the circumstances of the German boycott and how it originated. He
also proclaimed that the Germans were bent on a plan to "exterminate the
--
"The Hitler regime originated and are fiendishly prosecuting their boycott
to exterminate the Jews by placarding Jewish shops, warning Germans against
dealing with them, by imprisoning Jewish shopkeepers and parading them
through the streets by the hundreds under guard of Nazi troops for the sole
crime of being Jews, by ejecting them from the learned professions in which
many of them had attained eminence, by excluding their children from the
schools, their men from the labor unions, closing against them every avenue
of livelihood, locking them in vile concentration camps and starving and
torturing them without cause and resorting to every other conceivable form
of torture, inhuman beyond conception, until suicide has become their only
means of escape, and all solely because they are or their remote ancestors
were Jews, and all with the avowed object of exterminating them."
--
Untermyer concluded his largely fantastic and hysterical address by
declaring that with the support of "Christian friends... we will drive the
last nail in the coffin of bigotry and fanaticism...."
That his allegations against Germany were made long before even Jewish
historians today claim there were any gas chambers or even a plan to
"exterminate" the Jews, displays the nature of the propaganda campaign
confronting Germany.
However, during this same period there were some unusual developments at
work: The spring of 1933 also witnessed the beginning of a period of private
cooperation between the German government and the Zionist movement in
Germany and Palestine (and actually worldwide) to increase the flow of
German-Jewish immigrants and capital to Palestine.
The modern-day supporters of Zionist Israel and many historians have
succeeded in keeping this Nazi-Zionist pact a secret to the general public
for decades and while most Americans have no concept of the possibility that
there could have been outright collaboration between the Nazi leadership and
the founders of what became the state of Israel, the truth has begun to
emerge.
Dissident Jewish writer Lenni Brennar's Zionism In the Age of the Dictators,
published by a small press and not given the publicity it deserves by the
so-called "mainstream" media (which is otherwise obsessed with the Holocaust
era), was perhaps the first major endeavor in this realm.
In response to Brennar and others, the Zionist reaction has usually
consisted of declarations that their collaboration with Nazi Germany was
undertaken solely to save the lives of Jews. But the collaboration was all
the more remarkable because it took place at a time when many Jews and
Jewish organizations demanded a boycott of Germany.
To the Zionist leaders, Hitler's assumption of power held out the
possibility of a flow of immigrants to Palestine. Previously, the majority
of German Jews, who identified themselves as Germans, had little sympathy
with the Zionist cause of promoting the ingathering of world Jewry to
Palestine. But the Zionists saw that only the anti-Semitic Hitler was likely
to push the anti-Zionist German Jews into the arms of Zionism.
For all the modern-day wailing by worldwide supporters of Israel (not to
mention the Israelis themselves) about "the Holocaust", they neglect to
mention that making the situation in Germany as uncomfortable for the Jews
as possible - in cooperation with German National Socialism - was part of
the plan.
This was the genesis of the so-called Transfer Agreement, the agreement
between Zionist Jews and the National Socialist government to transfer
German Jewry to Palestine.
According to Jewish historian Walter Laqueur and many others, German Jews
were far from convinced that immigration to Palestine was the answer.
Furthermore, although the majority of German Jews refused to consider the
Zionists as their political leaders, it is clear that Hitler protected and
cooperated with the Zionists for the purposes of implementing the final
solution: the mass transfer of Jews to the Middle East.
Edwin Black, in his massive tome The Transfer Agreement (Macmillan, 1984),
stated that although most Jews did not want to flee to Palestine at all, due
to the Zionist movement's influence within Nazi Germany a Jew's best chance
of getting out of Germany was by emigrating to Palestine. In other words,
the Transfer Agreement itself mandated that Jewish capital could only to go
Palestine.
Thus, according to the Zionists, a Jew could leave Germany only if he went
to the Levant.
The primary difficulty with the Transfer Agreement (or even the idea of such
an agreement) was that the English [!!!; Scriptorium] were demanding, as a
condition of immigration, that each immigrant pay 1,000 pounds sterling upon
arrival in Haifa or elsewhere. The difficulty was that such hard currency
was nearly impossible to come by in a cash-strapped and radically
inflationary Germany. This was the main idea behind the final Transfer
--
"A large German bank would freeze funds paid in by immigrants in blocked
accounts for German exporters, while a bank in Palestine would control the
sale of German goods to Palestine, thereby providing the immigrants with the
necessary foreign currency on the spot. Sam Cohen, co-owner of Hanoaiah Ltd.
and initiator of the transfer endeavors, was however subjected to
long-lasting objections from his own people and finally had to concede that
such a transfer agreement could only be concluded on a much higher level
with a bank of its own rather than that of a private company. The renowned
Anglo-Palestine Bank in London would be included in this transfer deal and
create a trust company for [this] purpose."
--
Of course, this is of major historical importance in dealing with the
relationship between Zionism and National Socialism in Germany in the 1930s.
The relationship was not one merely of mutual interest and political
favoritism on the part of Hitler, but a close financial relationship with
--
"It was one thing for the Zionists to subvert the anti-Nazi boycott.
Zionism needed to transfer out the capital of German Jews, and merchandise
was the only available medium. But soon Zionist leaders understood that the
success of the future Jewish Palestinian economy would be inextricably bound
up with the survival of the Nazi economy. So the Zionist leadership was
compelled to go further. The German economy would have to be safeguarded,
stabilized, and if necessary reinforced. Hence, the Nazi party and the
Zionist organizers shared a common stake in the recovery of Germany."
--
Thus one sees a radical fissure in world Jewry around 1933 and beyond.
There were, first, the non-Zionist Jews (specifically the World Jewish
Congress founded in 1933), who, on the one hand, demanded the boycott and
eventual destruction of Germany. Black notes that many of these people were
not just in New York and Amsterdam, but a major source for this also came
from Palestine proper.
On the other hand, one can see the judicious use of such feelings by the
Zionists for the sake of eventual resettlement in Palestine. In other words,
it can be said (and Black does hint at this) that Zionism believed that,
since Jews would be moving to the Levant, capital flight would be necessary
for any new economy to function.
The result was the understanding that Zionism would have to ally itself
with National Socialism, so that the German government would not impede the
flow of Jewish capital out of the country.
It served the Zionist interests at the time that Jews be loud in their
denunciations of German practices against the Jews to scare them into the
Levant, but, on the other hand, Laqueur states that "The Zionists became
motivated not to jeopardize the German economy or currency." In other words,
the Zionist leadership of the Jewish Diaspora was one of subterfuge and
underhandedness, with only the advent of German hostility towards Jewry
convincing the world's Jews that immigration was the only escape.
The fact is that the ultimate establishment of the state of Israel was
based on fraud. The Zionists did not represent anything more than a small
minority of German Jews in 1933.
On the one hand, the Zionist fathers of Israel wanted loud denunciations
of Germany's "cruelties" to the world's Jews while at the same time
demanding moderation so that the National Socialist government would remain
stable, financially and politically. Thus Zionism boycotted the boycott.
For all intents and purposes, the National Socialist government was the
best thing to happen to Zionism in its history, for it "proved" to many Jews
that Europeans were irredeemably anti-Jewish and that Palestine was the only
answer: Zionism came to represent the overwhelming majority of Jews solely
by trickery and cooperation with Adolf Hitler.
For the Zionists, both the denunciations of German policies towards Jews
(to keep Jews frightened), plus the reinvigoration of the German economy
(for the sake of final resettlement) was imperative for the Zionist
movement. Ironically, today the Zionist leaders of Israel complain bitterly
about the horrific and inhuman regime of the National Socialists. So the
fraud continues.
--- The Barnes Review, 645 Pennsylvania Ave SE, Suite 100, Washington
D.C. 20003, USA.
--
I Like the Truth....
"Why Johnny Ringo! I'll be your 'huckleberry...' say when...!"
-Doc Holiday (in movie "Tombstone") to cowboy-outlaw Johnny Ringo
--
Force, no matter how concealed, begets resistance. - Lakota Sioux proverb
Listening to a liar is like drinking warm water. - Native American Unknown
A brave man dies but once, a coward many times. - Native American Unknown
--
They deem him their worst enemy who tells them the truth.
-Plato
--
"I've earned everything I've got."
- Richard M. Nixon
-------
Post by Jason P
It was a boycott, not a war. Boycotts are used as mechanisms of
protest. Jews were being persecuted in Nazi Germany and people have a
right to buy their goods from anyone they choose.
Get it now????
And the Nazis in turn decided to boycott the Jewry of Europe, and the rest
of the world -- the rest is history. Tit for tat....

Oh, believe me I get it, Tandy. The real question here ought to be ...do
you?

Unfortunately for Jews in Europe the Nazis went a little too far. But the
Zionist Jews of the world were trying to bring down an until then, lawful,
legal, and legitimate, German government. What would you expect?

When Osama Bin Laden tried to attack the U.S. we fought back -- and
rightfully so. The article -- which you did not read (while fully expecting
me to read your driveling horseshit) -- says quite clearly that it plainly
backfired on the Zionists. Germany's then shaky economy improved
dramatically almost overnight. Oops, poor us Jews! ...Guess it didn't work
right, huh!

The Nazis, no matter what they ultimately stood for in the end, were not
allowed to fight back?

Germany as a sovereign country cannot fight back? If your answer is a
standing patent "yes" then that would be an indication of your clearly
typical Judaic arrogant hubris. To hell with you and your despicable,
immoral, criminal-minded, people...!!!

Get it now?
RJ11
2010-10-14 16:24:38 UTC
Permalink
Post by Jason P
And the Nazis in turn decided to boycott the Jewry of Europe,
Not "in turn". Hitler's antisemitism was manifest long
before the boycott(s). In 1925, in "Mein Kampf", he wrote
that Germany should have gassed Jews during WW1.
Post by Jason P
The Nazis, no matter what they ultimately stood for in the end,
were not allowed to fight back?
"fight back"? By murdering millions of innocent civilians?

Are you insane?
Post by Jason P
Germany as a sovereign country cannot fight back? If your answer is a
standing patent "yes" then that would be an indication of your clearly
typical Judaic arrogant hubris. To hell with you and your despicable,
immoral, criminal-minded, people...!!!
Ah, shaddup, nazoid piglet.

RJ.
Joe Bruno
2010-10-14 08:10:09 UTC
Permalink
Post by Jason P
The Jewish Declaration of War on Nazi Germany
    The Economic Boycott of 1933
How Zionists fired the first shots of W.W.II
Have you seen this?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nazi_boycott_of_Jewish_businesses
RJ11
2010-10-14 08:45:08 UTC
Permalink
Post by Jason P
The Jewish Declaration of War on Nazi Germany
The Economic Boycott of 1933
Jesus Christ. What utter drivel.

Your beloved Hitler was a rabid antisemite long before
1933. Already in 1925 -- in "Mein Kampf" -- he expressed
his opinion that Germany should have gassed Jews during WW1.

So, when he was elected, some Jews called to boycott
German goods. If some country would elect as president someone
who called to gas Americans, would you not boycott that country's
goods?

Numerous Muslim leaders called to boycott Danish goods after
the "anti-Muslim cartoons" appeared in a Danish newspaper. Is
that a "declaration of war" against Denmark?

Sheesh. How stupid you people are.

RJ.
Joe Bruno
2010-10-14 11:14:43 UTC
Permalink
Post by Jason P
The Jewish Declaration of War on Nazi Germany
    The Economic Boycott of 1933
   Jesus Christ.  What utter drivel.
   Your beloved Hitler was a rabid antisemite long before
1933.  Already in 1925 -- in "Mein Kampf" -- he expressed
his opinion that Germany should have gassed Jews during WW1.
   So,  when he was elected,  some Jews called to boycott
German goods.  If some country would elect as president someone
who called to gas Americans,  would you not boycott that country's
goods?
   Numerous Muslim leaders called to boycott Danish goods after
the "anti-Muslim cartoons" appeared in a Danish newspaper.  Is
that a "declaration of war" against Denmark?
   Sheesh.  How stupid you people are.
RJ.
Hitler was never elected to the Chancellor post.The Nazis never got
more than 38% of the vote.Hindenburg appointed him chancellor as part
of a backroom deal.
Jason P
2010-10-14 15:53:35 UTC
Permalink
Post by Jason P
The Jewish Declaration of War on Nazi Germany
The Economic Boycott of 1933
Jesus Christ. What utter drivel.
Your beloved Hitler was a rabid antisemite long before
1933. Already in 1925 -- in "Mein Kampf" -- he expressed
his opinion that Germany should have gassed Jews during WW1.
So, when he was elected, some Jews called to boycott
German goods. If some country would elect as president someone
who called to gas Americans, would you not boycott that country's
goods?
Numerous Muslim leaders called to boycott Danish goods after
the "anti-Muslim cartoons" appeared in a Danish newspaper. Is
that a "declaration of war" against Denmark?
Sheesh. How stupid you people are.
RJ.
-----
Hitler was never elected to the Chancellor post.The Nazis never got
more than 38% of the vote.Hindenburg appointed him chancellor as part
of a backroom deal.
Where have you -- ever -- seen me say he won by a majority? Frankly, Tandy,
what you fail to realize is I don't even like the person in question. He was
an idiot and a moron; he was wrought with multiple insecurities and human
frailties, which his gang of evil backers tried to make up for with classic
Germanic arrogance. The article I posted -- had you read it -- clearly said
he was installed as German chancellor in a coalition form government.
...Duh!

When was the last Israeli prime minister installed in office with a clear
full majority? ...Dummy!

In all the years I've posted here, I've never seen you provoke your own
thought -- not once. Never have you ever stated anything but the obvious and
mundane, knuckle-dragging Judaic party line.You're not only stupid Tandy,
you're a moron for Jewry -- you're their poster boy.

You really should try some mental acuity exercises each day upon waking up.
Joe Bruno
2010-10-14 19:39:14 UTC
Permalink
Post by Jason P
Post by Jason P
The Jewish Declaration of War on Nazi Germany
The Economic Boycott of 1933
Jesus Christ. What utter drivel.
Your beloved Hitler was a rabid antisemite long before
1933. Already in 1925 -- in "Mein Kampf" -- he expressed
his opinion that Germany should have gassed Jews during WW1.
So, when he was elected, some Jews called to boycott
German goods. If some country would elect as president someone
who called to gas Americans, would you not boycott that country's
goods?
Numerous Muslim leaders called to boycott Danish goods after
the "anti-Muslim cartoons" appeared in a Danish newspaper. Is
that a "declaration of war" against Denmark?
Sheesh. How stupid you people are.
RJ.
-----
Hitler was never elected to the Chancellor post.The Nazis never got
more than 38% of the vote.Hindenburg appointed him chancellor as part
of a backroom deal.
Where have you -- ever -- seen me say he won by a majority? Frankly, Tandy,
what you fail to realize is I don't even like the person in question. He was
an idiot and a moron; he was wrought with multiple insecurities and human
frailties, which his gang of evil backers tried to make up for with classic
Germanic arrogance. The article I posted -- had you read it -- clearly said
he was installed as German chancellor in a coalition form government.
...Duh!
When was the last Israeli prime minister installed in office with a clear
full majority? ...Dummy!
In all the years I've posted here, I've never seen you provoke your own
thought -- not once. Never have you ever stated anything but the obvious and
mundane, knuckle-dragging Judaic party line.You're not only stupid Tandy,
you're a moron for Jewry -- you're their poster boy.
You really should try some mental acuity exercises each day upon waking up.- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
He didn't win any election in Germany. He was appointed by President
Hindenburg. to the Chancellor post.
Jason P
2010-10-14 19:45:17 UTC
Permalink
Post by Jason P
Post by Jason P
The Jewish Declaration of War on Nazi Germany
The Economic Boycott of 1933
Jesus Christ. What utter drivel.
Your beloved Hitler was a rabid antisemite long before
1933. Already in 1925 -- in "Mein Kampf" -- he expressed
his opinion that Germany should have gassed Jews during WW1.
So, when he was elected, some Jews called to boycott
German goods. If some country would elect as president someone
who called to gas Americans, would you not boycott that country's
goods?
Numerous Muslim leaders called to boycott Danish goods after
the "anti-Muslim cartoons" appeared in a Danish newspaper. Is
that a "declaration of war" against Denmark?
Sheesh. How stupid you people are.
RJ.
-----
Hitler was never elected to the Chancellor post.The Nazis never got
more than 38% of the vote.Hindenburg appointed him chancellor as part
of a backroom deal.
Where have you -- ever -- seen me say he won by a majority? Frankly, Tandy,
what you fail to realize is I don't even like the person in question. He was
an idiot and a moron; he was wrought with multiple insecurities and human
frailties, which his gang of evil backers tried to make up for with classic
Germanic arrogance. The article I posted -- had you read it -- clearly said
he was installed as German chancellor in a coalition form government.
...Duh!
When was the last Israeli prime minister installed in office with a clear
full majority? ...Dummy!
In all the years I've posted here, I've never seen you provoke your own
thought -- not once. Never have you ever stated anything but the obvious and
mundane, knuckle-dragging Judaic party line.You're not only stupid Tandy,
you're a moron for Jewry -- you're their poster boy.
You really should try some mental acuity exercises each day upon waking
up.- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
-------
Post by Jason P
He didn't win any election in Germany. He was appointed by President
Hindenburg. to the Chancellor post.
AGAIN... (for the thick minded)... Where have you -- ever -- seen me say
Hitler won anything by a majority, or any other margin? You are as thick as
a solid brick. Classic Jew stupidity. Taking up with matters not even under
scrutiny, or mentioned.... Law school...huh? ...Sure it wasn't a bad stretch
in the below 'decks barrel?
CUNTICA
2010-10-15 00:54:48 UTC
Permalink
" He didn't win any election in Germany. He was appointed by President
Hindenburg. to the Chancellor post."

................................Hindenburg was so senile by then, he
had to be reminded to wear pants in public!
Joe Bruno
2010-10-15 03:56:32 UTC
Permalink
Post by CUNTICA
" He didn't win any election in Germany. He was appointed by President
Hindenburg. to the Chancellor post."
................................Hindenburg was so senile by then, he
had to be reminded to wear pants in public!
General Erich Ludendorff, a hero of the first world war who knew
Hitler well, sent a telegram to Hindenburg telling him he'd made a
terrible mistake.
NefeshBarYochai
2010-10-15 04:23:45 UTC
Permalink
Post by Joe Bruno
Post by CUNTICA
" He didn't win any election in Germany. He was appointed by President
Hindenburg. to the Chancellor post."
................................Hindenburg was so senile by then, he
had to be reminded to wear pants in public!
General Erich Ludendorff, a hero of the first world war who knew
Hitler well, sent a telegram to Hindenburg telling him he'd made a
terrible mistake.
All you have to do is read Mein Kampf and anyone with any good in
their soul will quickly realize that Hitler was an out of control
megalomaniac bent on exterminating the Jewish people. I wish Benjamin
Segal would have assassinated him like he had planned.
Joe Bruno
2010-10-15 04:28:51 UTC
Permalink
Post by NefeshBarYochai
Post by Joe Bruno
Post by CUNTICA
" He didn't win any election in Germany. He was appointed by President
Hindenburg. to the Chancellor post."
................................Hindenburg was so senile by then, he
had to be reminded to wear pants in public!
General Erich Ludendorff, a hero of the first world war who knew
Hitler well, sent a telegram to Hindenburg telling him he'd made a
terrible mistake.
All you have to do is read Mein Kampf and anyone with any good in
their soul will quickly realize that Hitler was an out of control
megalomaniac bent on exterminating the Jewish people.  I wish Benjamin
Segal would have assassinated him like he had planned.
I think Segal planned to kill Mussolini.
NefeshBarYochai
2010-10-15 04:46:01 UTC
Permalink
Post by NefeshBarYochai
Post by Joe Bruno
Post by CUNTICA
" He didn't win any election in Germany. He was appointed by President
Hindenburg. to the Chancellor post."
................................Hindenburg was so senile by then, he
had to be reminded to wear pants in public!
General Erich Ludendorff, a hero of the first world war who knew
Hitler well, sent a telegram to Hindenburg telling him he'd made a
terrible mistake.
All you have to do is read Mein Kampf and anyone with any good in
their soul will quickly realize that Hitler was an out of control
megalomaniac bent on exterminating the Jewish people.  I wish Benjamin
Segal would have assassinated him like he had planned.
I think Segal planned to kill Mussolini.- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
I spelled his name wrong. It should be Benjamin "Bugsy" Siegel. I've
looked all over the place and I can't find my source. You maybe
correct.
Joe Bruno
2010-10-15 08:21:01 UTC
Permalink
Post by NefeshBarYochai
Post by Joe Bruno
Post by CUNTICA
" He didn't win any election in Germany. He was appointed by President
Hindenburg. to the Chancellor post."
................................Hindenburg was so senile by then, he
had to be reminded to wear pants in public!
General Erich Ludendorff, a hero of the first world war who knew
Hitler well, sent a telegram to Hindenburg telling him he'd made a
terrible mistake.
All you have to do is read Mein Kampf and anyone with any good in
their soul will quickly realize that Hitler was an out of control
megalomaniac bent on exterminating the Jewish people.  I wish Benjamin
Segal would have assassinated him like he had planned.
I think Segal planned to kill Mussolini.- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
I spelled his name wrong.  It should be Benjamin "Bugsy" Siegel.  I've
looked all over the place and I can't find my source.  You maybe
correct.- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
See the movie "Mobsters".
Jason P
2010-10-15 14:03:11 UTC
Permalink
Post by NefeshBarYochai
Post by Joe Bruno
Post by CUNTICA
" He didn't win any election in Germany. He was appointed by President
Hindenburg. to the Chancellor post."
................................Hindenburg was so senile by then, he
had to be reminded to wear pants in public!
General Erich Ludendorff, a hero of the first world war who knew
Hitler well, sent a telegram to Hindenburg telling him he'd made a
terrible mistake.
All you have to do is read Mein Kampf and anyone with any good in
their soul will quickly realize that Hitler was an out of control
megalomaniac bent on exterminating the Jewish people. I wish Benjamin
Segal would have assassinated him like he had planned.
I think Segal planned to kill Mussolini.- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
I spelled his name wrong. It should be Benjamin "Bugsy" Siegel. I've
looked all over the place and I can't find my source. You maybe
correct.- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
-------
See the movie "Mobsters".
Are you two are pushing paper slippers around together at the local loony
bin now? Taking your anti-psychotic meds together now?

Ahhhhhhahahahahahahahaha.. lol
NefeshBarYochai
2010-10-15 17:53:07 UTC
Permalink
Post by Jason P
Post by NefeshBarYochai
Post by Joe Bruno
Post by CUNTICA
" He didn't win any election in Germany. He was appointed by President
Hindenburg. to the Chancellor post."
................................Hindenburg was so senile by then, he
had to be reminded to wear pants in public!
General Erich Ludendorff, a hero of the first world war who knew
Hitler well, sent a telegram to Hindenburg telling him he'd made a
terrible mistake.
All you have to do is read Mein Kampf and anyone with any good in
their soul will quickly realize that Hitler was an out of control
megalomaniac bent on exterminating the Jewish people. I wish Benjamin
Segal would have assassinated him like he had planned.
I think Segal planned to kill Mussolini.- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
I spelled his name wrong. It should be Benjamin "Bugsy" Siegel. I've
looked all over the place and I can't find my source. You maybe
correct.- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
-------
See the movie "Mobsters".
Are you two are pushing paper slippers around together at the local loony
bin now? Taking your anti-psychotic meds together now?
Ahhhhhhahahahahahahahaha..        lol- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
You are a homosexual that jacks-off that is why the kicked you out of
the airforce with an undesirable discharge.
Joe Bruno
2010-10-16 06:28:05 UTC
Permalink
Post by NefeshBarYochai
Post by Jason P
Post by NefeshBarYochai
Post by Joe Bruno
Post by CUNTICA
" He didn't win any election in Germany. He was appointed by
President
Hindenburg. to the Chancellor post."
................................Hindenburg was so senile by then,
he
had to be reminded to wear pants in public!
General Erich Ludendorff, a hero of the first world war who knew
Hitler well, sent a telegram to Hindenburg telling him he'd made a
terrible mistake.
All you have to do is read Mein Kampf and anyone with any good in
their soul will quickly realize that Hitler was an out of control
megalomaniac bent on exterminating the Jewish people. I wish Benjamin
Segal would have assassinated him like he had planned.
I think Segal planned to kill Mussolini.- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
I spelled his name wrong. It should be Benjamin "Bugsy" Siegel. I've
looked all over the place and I can't find my source. You maybe
correct.- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
-------
See the movie "Mobsters".
Are you two are pushing paper slippers around together at the local loony
bin now? Taking your anti-psychotic meds together now?
Ahhhhhhahahahahahahahaha..        lol- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
You are a homosexual that jacks-off that is why the kicked you out of
the airforce with an undesirable discharge.- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
One time he tried masturbating with a Brillo pad. He did it so fast
that it actually circumcized him.
Jason P
2010-10-16 11:21:58 UTC
Permalink
Post by NefeshBarYochai
Post by Jason P
Post by NefeshBarYochai
Post by Joe Bruno
Post by CUNTICA
" He didn't win any election in Germany. He was appointed by
President
Hindenburg. to the Chancellor post."
................................Hindenburg was so senile by then,
he
had to be reminded to wear pants in public!
General Erich Ludendorff, a hero of the first world war who knew
Hitler well, sent a telegram to Hindenburg telling him he'd made a
terrible mistake.
All you have to do is read Mein Kampf and anyone with any good in
their soul will quickly realize that Hitler was an out of control
megalomaniac bent on exterminating the Jewish people. I wish Benjamin
Segal would have assassinated him like he had planned.
I think Segal planned to kill Mussolini.- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
I spelled his name wrong. It should be Benjamin "Bugsy" Siegel. I've
looked all over the place and I can't find my source. You maybe
correct.- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
-------
See the movie "Mobsters".
Are you two are pushing paper slippers around together at the local loony
bin now? Taking your anti-psychotic meds together now?
Ahhhhhhahahahahahahahaha.. lol- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
You are a homosexual that jacks-off that is why the kicked you out of
the airforce with an undesirable discharge.- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
-------
Post by NefeshBarYochai
One time he tried masturbating with a Brillo pad. He did it so fast
that it actually circumcized him.
You two have found the same level. ...Pushing paper slippers around the
local state mental hospital together.
Joe Bruno
2010-10-14 19:41:55 UTC
Permalink
Post by Jason P
Post by Jason P
The Jewish Declaration of War on Nazi Germany
The Economic Boycott of 1933
Jesus Christ. What utter drivel.
Your beloved Hitler was a rabid antisemite long before
1933. Already in 1925 -- in "Mein Kampf" -- he expressed
his opinion that Germany should have gassed Jews during WW1.
So, when he was elected, some Jews called to boycott
German goods. If some country would elect as president someone
who called to gas Americans, would you not boycott that country's
goods?
Numerous Muslim leaders called to boycott Danish goods after
the "anti-Muslim cartoons" appeared in a Danish newspaper. Is
that a "declaration of war" against Denmark?
Sheesh. How stupid you people are.
RJ.
-----
Hitler was never elected to the Chancellor post.The Nazis never got
more than 38% of the vote.Hindenburg appointed him chancellor as part
of a backroom deal.
Where have you -- ever -- seen me say he won by a majority? Frankly, Tandy,
what you fail to realize is I don't even like the person in question. He was
an idiot and a moron; he was wrought with multiple insecurities and human
frailties, which his gang of evil backers tried to make up for with classic
Germanic arrogance. The article I posted -- had you read it -- clearly said
he was installed as German chancellor in a coalition form government.
...Duh!
When was the last Israeli prime minister installed in office with a clear
full majority? ...Dummy!
In all the years I've posted here, I've never seen you provoke your own
thought -- not once. Never have you ever stated anything but the obvious and
mundane, knuckle-dragging Judaic party line.You're not only stupid Tandy,
you're a moron for Jewry -- you're their poster boy.
You really should try some mental acuity exercises each day upon waking up.- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
http://www.historyplace.com/worldwar2/holocaust/h-chancl.htm


See that word"appointed"??????????????????

That's different than being elected, fool.
Jason P
2010-10-14 19:49:12 UTC
Permalink
Post by Jason P
Post by Jason P
The Jewish Declaration of War on Nazi Germany
The Economic Boycott of 1933
Jesus Christ. What utter drivel.
Your beloved Hitler was a rabid antisemite long before
1933. Already in 1925 -- in "Mein Kampf" -- he expressed
his opinion that Germany should have gassed Jews during WW1.
So, when he was elected, some Jews called to boycott
German goods. If some country would elect as president someone
who called to gas Americans, would you not boycott that country's
goods?
Numerous Muslim leaders called to boycott Danish goods after
the "anti-Muslim cartoons" appeared in a Danish newspaper. Is
that a "declaration of war" against Denmark?
Sheesh. How stupid you people are.
RJ.
-----
Hitler was never elected to the Chancellor post.The Nazis never got
more than 38% of the vote.Hindenburg appointed him chancellor as part
of a backroom deal.
Where have you -- ever -- seen me say he won by a majority? Frankly, Tandy,
what you fail to realize is I don't even like the person in question. He was
an idiot and a moron; he was wrought with multiple insecurities and human
frailties, which his gang of evil backers tried to make up for with classic
Germanic arrogance. The article I posted -- had you read it -- clearly said
he was installed as German chancellor in a coalition form government.
...Duh!
When was the last Israeli prime minister installed in office with a clear
full majority? ...Dummy!
In all the years I've posted here, I've never seen you provoke your own
thought -- not once. Never have you ever stated anything but the obvious and
mundane, knuckle-dragging Judaic party line.You're not only stupid Tandy,
you're a moron for Jewry -- you're their poster boy.
You really should try some mental acuity exercises each day upon waking
up.- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
----------
Post by Jason P
http://www.historyplace.com/worldwar2/holocaust/h-chancl.htm
See that word"appointed"??????????????????
That's different than being elected, fool.
AGAIN where did I mention he was "elected?"

I may have said it in passing but I DOUBT IT, I wouldn't generally say that
sort of thing. I didn't like the man. ....Been chewing your toenails again?
Michael Ragland
2010-10-14 21:34:25 UTC
Permalink
Post by Jason P
Post by Jason P
The Jewish Declaration of War on Nazi Germany
The Economic Boycott of 1933
Jesus Christ. What utter drivel.
Your beloved Hitler was a rabid antisemite long before
1933. Already in 1925 -- in "Mein Kampf" -- he expressed
his opinion that Germany should have gassed Jews during WW1.
So, when he was elected, some Jews called to boycott
German goods. If some country would elect as president someone
who called to gas Americans, would you not boycott that country's
goods?
Numerous Muslim leaders called to boycott Danish goods after
the "anti-Muslim cartoons" appeared in a Danish newspaper. Is
that a "declaration of war" against Denmark?
Sheesh. How stupid you people are.
RJ.
-----
Hitler was never elected to the Chancellor post.The Nazis never got
more than 38% of the vote.Hindenburg appointed him chancellor as part
of a backroom deal.
Where have you -- ever -- seen me say he won by a majority? Frankly, Tandy,
what you fail to realize is I don't even like the person in question. He was
an idiot and a moron; he was wrought with multiple insecurities and human
frailties, which his gang of evil backers tried to make up for with classic
Germanic arrogance. The article I posted -- had you read it -- clearly said
he was installed as German chancellor in a coalition form government.
...Duh!
Hitler was not an idiot or a moron but I think you are. Yes, Hitler
had multiple
insecurities and human frailties but he was not a stooge..
Post by Jason P
When was the last Israeli prime minister installed in office with a clear
full majority? ...Dummy!
In all the years I've posted here, I've never seen you provoke your own
thought -- not once. Never have you ever stated anything but the obvious and
mundane, knuckle-dragging Judaic party line.You're not only stupid Tandy,
you're a moron for Jewry -- you're their poster boy.
You really should try some mental acuity exercises each day upon waking up.
NefeshBarYochai
2010-10-15 03:49:45 UTC
Permalink
Post by Michael Ragland
Post by Jason P
Post by Jason P
The Jewish Declaration of War on Nazi Germany
The Economic Boycott of 1933
Jesus Christ. What utter drivel.
Your beloved Hitler was a rabid antisemite long before
1933. Already in 1925 -- in "Mein Kampf" -- he expressed
his opinion that Germany should have gassed Jews during WW1.
So, when he was elected, some Jews called to boycott
German goods. If some country would elect as president someone
who called to gas Americans, would you not boycott that country's
goods?
Numerous Muslim leaders called to boycott Danish goods after
the "anti-Muslim cartoons" appeared in a Danish newspaper. Is
that a "declaration of war" against Denmark?
Sheesh. How stupid you people are.
RJ.
-----
Hitler was never elected to the Chancellor post.The Nazis never got
more than 38% of the vote.Hindenburg appointed him chancellor as part
of a backroom deal.
Where have you -- ever -- seen me say he won by a majority? Frankly, Tandy,
what you fail to realize is I don't even like the person in question. He was
an idiot and a moron; he was wrought with multiple insecurities and human
frailties, which his gang of evil backers tried to make up for with classic
Germanic arrogance. The article I posted -- had you read it -- clearly said
he was installed as German chancellor in a coalition form government.
...Duh!
Hitler was not an idiot or a moron but I think you are. Yes, Hitler
had multiple
insecurities and human frailties but he was not a stooge..
Post by Jason P
When was the last Israeli prime minister installed in office with a clear
full majority? ...Dummy!
In all the years I've posted here, I've never seen you provoke your own
thought -- not once. Never have you ever stated anything but the obvious and
mundane, knuckle-dragging Judaic party line.You're not only stupid Tandy,
you're a moron for Jewry -- you're their poster boy.
You really should try some mental acuity exercises each day upon waking up.- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
Hitler was a misfit out of control. He ate to much sugar and jacked-
off to much. Typical German.
mirjam
2010-10-15 04:30:52 UTC
Permalink
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_War_I

"Great War" redirects here. For other uses, see Great War
(disambiguation).
World War I
WW1 TitlePicture For Wikipedia Article.jpg
Clockwise from top: Trenches on the Western Front; a British Mark IV
Tank crossing a trench; Royal Navy battleship HMS Irresistible sinking
after striking a mine at the Battle of the Dardanelles; a Vickers
machine gun crew with gas masks, and German Albatros D.III biplanes
Date 28 July 1914 – 11 November 1918 (Armistice)

Treaty of Versailles signed 28 June 1919
Location Europe, Africa, the Middle East, and the Pacific Islands
(briefly in China)
Result Allied victory

* End of the German, Russian, Ottoman, and Austro-Hungarian
empires
* Formation of new countries in Europe and the Middle East
* Transfer of German colonies and regions of the former Ottoman
Empire to other powers
* Establishment of the League of Nations. (more...)

Belligerents
Allied (Entente) Powers

France France
United Kingdom British Empire
Russian Empire (1914–17)
Italy (1915–18)
United States (1917–18)
Japan
Serbia
Romania (1916–18)
Belgium
Greece (1917–18)
Portugal Portugal (1916–18)
Montenegro Montenegro (1914–16)
Brazil Brazil (1916-18)
and others
Central Powers

German Empire
Austria-Hungary
Ottoman Empire
Bulgaria (1915–18)
Commanders and leaders
Leaders and commanders

France Raymond Poincaré
France Georges Clemenceau
France Ferdinand Foch
United Kingdom H. H. Asquith
United Kingdom David Lloyd George
Russian Empire Nicholas II
Kingdom of Italy (1861–1946) Antonio Salandra
Kingdom of Italy (1861–1946) Vittorio Orlando
United States Woodrow Wilson
and others
Leaders and commanders

German Empire Wilhelm II
German Empire Paul von Hindenburg
German Empire Erich Ludendorff
Austria–Hungary Franz Joseph I
Austria–Hungary Karl I
Ottoman Empire İsmail Enver
Bulgaria Ferdinand I
and others
Strength
Allies

Russian Empire 15,000,000

France 8,317,000

Kingdom of Italy (1861–1946) 5,200,000

United Kingdom 5,000,000+

United States 4,000,000

Kingdom of Romania 660,000

Kingdom of Serbia 420,000

Belgium 267,000

Kingdom of Greece 250,000

Montenegro 40,000+

Portugal 33,000

Total: 39,087,000+ (estimated)[citation needed]
Central Powers

German Empire 13,000,000

Austria–Hungary 7,800,000

Ottoman Empire 2,000,000+

Kingdom of Bulgaria 1,200,000

Total: 24,000,000+ (estimated)[citation needed]
Casualties and losses
Military dead:
5,525,000
Military wounded:
12,831,500
Military missing:
4,121,000
Total:
22,477,500 KIA, WIA or MIA ...further details. Military dead:
4,386,000
Military wounded:
8,388,000
Military missing:
3,629,000
Total:
16,403,000 KIA, WIA or MIA ...further details.

World War I was a military conflict centered on Europe that began in
the summer of 1914. The fighting ended in late 1918. This conflict
involved all of the world's great powers,[1] assembled in two opposing
alliances: the Allies (centred around the Triple Entente) and the
Central Powers.[2] More than 70 million military personnel, including
60 million Europeans, were mobilized in one of the largest wars in
history.[3][4] More than 9 million combatants were killed, due largely
to great technological advances in firepower without corresponding
ones in mobility. It was the second deadliest conflict in history.[5]

The term World War One is particularly common in American English,
whereas in Britain and the The Commonwealth, it is more commonly
called the First World War. This term was first coined in 1920 as the
title of Charles à Court Repington's book, but references to it being
the first war did not become popular until World War II. The terms
World War One and Two were first used in Time magazine in 1938. During
and in the aftermath of the conflict it was called the Great War,
particularly in British newspapers, whereas US media preferred simply
the World War. It was also known as the War To End All Wars.[6]



The assassination on 28 June 1914 of Archduke Franz Ferdinand of
Austria, the heir to the throne of Austria-Hungary, is seen as the
immediate trigger of the war. Long-term causes, such as imperialistic
foreign policies of the great powers of Europe, such as the German
Empire, the Austro-Hungarian Empire, the Ottoman Empire, the Russian
Empire, the British Empire, France, and Italy, played a major role.
Ferdinand's assassination by a Yugoslav nationalist resulted in a
Habsburg ultimatum against the Kingdom of Serbia.[7][8] Several
alliances formed over the past decades were invoked, so within weeks
the major powers were at war; as all had colonies, the conflict soon
spread around the world.

On 28 July the conflict opened with the Austro-Hungarian invasion of
Serbia[9][10], followed by the German invasion of Belgium, Luxembourg
and France; and a Russian attack against Germany. After the German
march on Paris was brought to a halt, the Western Front settled into a
static battle of attrition with a trench line that changed little
until 1917. In the East, the Russian army successfully fought against
the Austro-Hungarian forces but was forced back by the German army.
Additional fronts opened after the Ottoman Empire joined the war in
1914, Italy and Bulgaria in 1915 and Romania in 1916. The Russian
Empire collapsed in 1917, and Russia left the war after the October
Revolution later that year. After a 1918 German offensive along the
western front, United States forces entered the trenches and the
allies drove back the German armies in a series of successful
offensives. Germany agreed to a cease fire on 11 November 1918, later
known as Armistice Day.

By the war's end, four major imperial powers—the German, Russian,
Austro-Hungarian and Ottoman Empires—had been militarily and
politically defeated. The last two ceased to exist.[11] The
revolutionized Soviet Union emerged from the Russian Empire, while the
map of central Europe was completely redrawn into numerous smaller
states.[12] The League of Nations was formed in the hope of preventing
another such conflict. The European nationalism spawned by the war and
the break-up of empires, and the repercussions of Germany's defeat and
the Treaty of Versailles led to the beginning of World War II in 1939.
[13]
Contents
Joe Bruno
2010-10-15 08:19:35 UTC
Permalink
Post by mirjam
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_War_I
"Great War" redirects here. For other uses, see Great War
(disambiguation).
World War I
WW1 TitlePicture For Wikipedia Article.jpg
Clockwise from top: Trenches on the Western Front; a British Mark IV
Tank crossing a trench; Royal Navy battleship HMS Irresistible sinking
after striking a mine at the Battle of the Dardanelles; a Vickers
machine gun crew with gas masks, and German Albatros D.III biplanes
Date    28 July 1914 – 11 November 1918 (Armistice)
Treaty of Versailles signed 28 June 1919
Location        Europe, Africa, the Middle East, and the Pacific Islands
(briefly in China)
Result  Allied victory
    * End of the German, Russian, Ottoman, and Austro-Hungarian
empires
    * Formation of new countries in Europe and the Middle East
    * Transfer of German colonies and regions of the former Ottoman
Empire to other powers
    * Establishment of the League of Nations. (more...)
Belligerents
Allied (Entente) Powers
France France
United Kingdom British Empire
 Russian Empire (1914–17)
 Italy (1915–18)
 United States (1917–18)
 Japan
 Serbia
 Romania (1916–18)
 Belgium
 Greece (1917–18)
Portugal Portugal (1916–18)
Montenegro Montenegro (1914–16)
Brazil Brazil (1916-18)
and others
        Central Powers
 German Empire
 Austria-Hungary
 Ottoman Empire
 Bulgaria (1915–18)
Commanders and leaders
Leaders and commanders
France Raymond Poincaré
France Georges Clemenceau
France Ferdinand Foch
United Kingdom H. H. Asquith
United Kingdom David Lloyd George
Russian Empire Nicholas II
Kingdom of Italy (1861–1946) Antonio Salandra
Kingdom of Italy (1861–1946) Vittorio Orlando
United States Woodrow Wilson
and others
        Leaders and commanders
German Empire Wilhelm II
German Empire Paul von Hindenburg
German Empire Erich Ludendorff
Austria–Hungary Franz Joseph I
Austria–Hungary Karl I
Ottoman Empire İsmail Enver
Bulgaria Ferdinand I
and others
Strength
Allies
Russian Empire 15,000,000
France 8,317,000
Kingdom of Italy (1861–1946) 5,200,000
United Kingdom 5,000,000+
United States 4,000,000
Kingdom of Romania 660,000
Kingdom of Serbia 420,000
Belgium 267,000
Kingdom of Greece 250,000
Montenegro 40,000+
Portugal 33,000
Total: 39,087,000+ (estimated)[citation needed]
        Central Powers
German Empire 13,000,000
Austria–Hungary 7,800,000
Ottoman Empire 2,000,000+
Kingdom of Bulgaria 1,200,000
Total: 24,000,000+ (estimated)[citation needed]
Casualties and losses
5,525,000
12,831,500
4,121,000
4,386,000
8,388,000
3,629,000
16,403,000 KIA, WIA or MIA ...further details.
World War I was a military conflict centered on Europe that began in
the summer of 1914. The fighting ended in late 1918. This conflict
involved all of the world's great powers,[1] assembled in two opposing
alliances: the Allies (centred around the Triple Entente) and the
Central Powers.[2] More than 70 million military personnel, including
60 million Europeans, were mobilized in one of the largest wars in
history.[3][4] More than 9 million combatants were killed, due largely
to great technological advances in firepower without corresponding
ones in mobility. It was the second deadliest conflict in history.[5]
The term World War One is particularly common in American English,
whereas in Britain and the The Commonwealth, it is more commonly
called the First World War. This term was first coined in 1920 as the
title of Charles à Court Repington's book, but references to it being
the first war did not become popular until World War II. The terms
World War One and Two were first used in Time magazine in 1938. During
and in the aftermath of the conflict it was called the Great War,
particularly in British newspapers, whereas US media preferred simply
the World War. It was also known as the War To End All Wars.[6]
The assassination on 28 June 1914 of Archduke Franz Ferdinand of
Austria, the heir to the throne of Austria-Hungary, is seen as the
immediate trigger of the war. Long-term causes, such as imperialistic
foreign policies of the great powers of Europe, such as the German
Empire, the Austro-Hungarian Empire, the Ottoman Empire, the Russian
Empire, the British Empire, France, and Italy, played a major role.
Ferdinand's assassination by a Yugoslav nationalist resulted in a
Habsburg ultimatum against the Kingdom of Serbia.[7][8] Several
alliances formed over the past decades were invoked, so within weeks
the major powers were at war; as all had colonies, the conflict soon
spread around the world.
On 28 July the conflict opened with the Austro-Hungarian invasion of
Serbia[9][10], followed by the German invasion of Belgium, Luxembourg
and France; and a Russian attack against Germany. After the German
march on Paris was brought to a halt, the Western Front settled into a
static battle of attrition with a trench line that changed little
until 1917. In the East, the Russian army successfully fought against
the Austro-Hungarian forces but was forced back by the German army.
Additional fronts opened after the Ottoman Empire joined the war in
1914, Italy and Bulgaria in 1915 and Romania in 1916. The Russian
Empire collapsed in 1917, and Russia left the war after the October
Revolution later that year. After a 1918 German offensive along the
western front, United States forces entered the trenches and the
allies drove back the German armies in a series of successful
offensives. Germany agreed to a cease fire on 11 November 1918, later
known as Armistice Day.
By the war's end, four major imperial powers—the German, Russian,
Austro-Hungarian and Ottoman Empires—had been militarily and
politically defeated. The last two ceased to exist.[11] The
revolutionized Soviet Union emerged from the Russian Empire, while the
map of central Europe was completely redrawn into numerous smaller
states.[12] The League of Nations was formed in the hope of preventing
another such conflict. The European nationalism spawned by the war and
the break-up of empires, and the repercussions of Germany's defeat and
the Treaty of Versailles led to the beginning of World War II in 1939.
[13]
Contents
I've seen this website and I like it. The first world war interests me
alot more than WWII, especially the aircraft. I love those wildly
colored biplanes. Baron Von Richtofen fascinates me.
The Allies had so much respect for him that they gave him a fancy
military funeral after they shot him down.
Jason P
2010-10-15 14:12:50 UTC
Permalink
"mirjam" <***@actcom.co.il> wrote in message news:2ece9589-afea-4c08-bfdb-***@c10g2000yqh.googlegroups.com...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_War_I

[...]

Russian Empire 15,000,000

France 8,317,000

Kingdom of Italy (1861-1946) 5,200,000

United Kingdom 5,000,000+

United States 4,000,000

Kingdom of Romania 660,000

Kingdom of Serbia 420,000

Belgium 267,000

Kingdom of Greece 250,000

Montenegro 40,000+

Portugal 33,000

Total: 39,087,000+ (estimated)[citation needed]
Central Powers

German Empire 13,000,000

Austria-Hungary 7,800,000

Ottoman Empire 2,000,000+

Kingdom of Bulgaria 1,200,000

Total: 24,000,000+ (estimated)[citation needed]
Casualties and losses
Military dead:
5,525,000
Military wounded:
12,831,500
Military missing:
4,121,000
Total:
22,477,500 KIA, WIA or MIA ...further details. Military dead:
4,386,000
Military wounded:
8,388,000
Military missing:
3,629,000
Total:
16,403,000 KIA, WIA or MIA ...further details.

[...]

---------------------


What no dead Jews, Mijam?
mirjam
2010-10-15 15:49:24 UTC
Permalink
Post by Jason P
What no dead Jews, Mijam?
In WW l Jews fought in their countries, and were not counted as Jews
but as Polish, German austrians etc,,, each according to the army he
served in . Thus the above numbers INCLUDE Jews as well.
mirjam
Jason P
2010-10-15 15:58:49 UTC
Permalink
Post by mirjam
Post by Jason P
What no dead Jews, Mijam?
In WW l Jews fought in their countries, and were not counted as Jews
Which is how it should have been in W.W.II. Ever hear of a Catholic
"holocaust' or a Buddhist "holocaust," or a Lutheran "holocaust?" ...of
course not!
Post by mirjam
but as Polish, German austrians etc,,, each according to the army he
served in . Thus the above numbers INCLUDE Jews as well.
mirjam
george
2010-10-15 21:16:30 UTC
Permalink
Post by Jason P
What no dead Jews, Mijam?
In WW l  Jews fought in their countries, and were not counted as Jews
but as Polish, German austrians etc,,, each according to the army he
served in . Thus the above numbers INCLUDE Jews as well.
mirjam
In fact a German ace who flew with Baron Von Richtofen was Jewish.
Many soldiers in the German Army in WW1 were Jewish
Jason P
2010-10-15 14:06:31 UTC
Permalink
Post by Jason P
Post by Jason P
The Jewish Declaration of War on Nazi Germany
The Economic Boycott of 1933
Jesus Christ. What utter drivel.
Your beloved Hitler was a rabid antisemite long before
1933. Already in 1925 -- in "Mein Kampf" -- he expressed
his opinion that Germany should have gassed Jews during WW1.
So, when he was elected, some Jews called to boycott
German goods. If some country would elect as president someone
who called to gas Americans, would you not boycott that country's
goods?
Numerous Muslim leaders called to boycott Danish goods after
the "anti-Muslim cartoons" appeared in a Danish newspaper. Is
that a "declaration of war" against Denmark?
Sheesh. How stupid you people are.
RJ.
-----
Hitler was never elected to the Chancellor post.The Nazis never got
more than 38% of the vote.Hindenburg appointed him chancellor as part
of a backroom deal.
Where have you -- ever -- seen me say he won by a majority? Frankly, Tandy,
what you fail to realize is I don't even like the person in question. He was
an idiot and a moron; he was wrought with multiple insecurities and human
frailties, which his gang of evil backers tried to make up for with classic
Germanic arrogance. The article I posted -- had you read it -- clearly said
he was installed as German chancellor in a coalition form government.
...Duh!
---------
Post by Jason P
Hitler was not an idiot or a moron but I think you are. Yes, Hitler
had multiple
insecurities and human frailties but he was not a stooge..
Stick to what you know best, cutting-and-pasting Mr. SOB McVay's drivel from
Nizkor. I'M NOT TALKING TO YOU HERE. Stay on topic!
Post by Jason P
When was the last Israeli prime minister installed in office with a clear
full majority? ...Dummy!
In all the years I've posted here, I've never seen you provoke your own
thought -- not once. Never have you ever stated anything but the obvious and
mundane, knuckle-dragging Judaic party line.You're not only stupid Tandy,
you're a moron for Jewry -- you're their poster boy.
You really should try some mental acuity exercises each day upon waking up.
Joe Bruno
2010-10-14 22:18:41 UTC
Permalink
Post by Jason P
Post by Jason P
The Jewish Declaration of War on Nazi Germany
The Economic Boycott of 1933
Jesus Christ. What utter drivel.
Your beloved Hitler was a rabid antisemite long before
1933. Already in 1925 -- in "Mein Kampf" -- he expressed
his opinion that Germany should have gassed Jews during WW1.
So, when he was elected, some Jews called to boycott
German goods. If some country would elect as president someone
who called to gas Americans, would you not boycott that country's
goods?
Numerous Muslim leaders called to boycott Danish goods after
the "anti-Muslim cartoons" appeared in a Danish newspaper. Is
that a "declaration of war" against Denmark?
Sheesh. How stupid you people are.
RJ.
-----
Hitler was never elected to the Chancellor post.The Nazis never got
more than 38% of the vote.Hindenburg appointed him chancellor as part
of a backroom deal.
Where have you -- ever -- seen me say he won by a majority? Frankly, Tandy,
what you fail to realize is I don't even like the person in question. He was
an idiot and a moron; he was wrought with multiple insecurities and human
frailties, which his gang of evil backers tried to make up for with classic
Germanic arrogance. The article I posted -- had you read it -- clearly said
he was installed as German chancellor in a coalition form government.
...Duh!
When was the last Israeli prime minister installed in office with a clear
full majority? ...Dummy!
In all the years I've posted here, I've never seen you provoke your own
thought -- not once. Never have you ever stated anything but the obvious and
mundane, knuckle-dragging Judaic party line.You're not only stupid Tandy,
you're a moron for Jewry -- you're their poster boy.
You really should try some mental acuity exercises each day upon waking up.- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
PSST! Here ya go, jackass. See that word "appointed"???

http://www.historyplace.com/worldwar2/holocaust/h-chancl.htm
Jason P
2010-10-15 14:23:51 UTC
Permalink
Post by Jason P
Post by Jason P
The Jewish Declaration of War on Nazi Germany
The Economic Boycott of 1933
Jesus Christ. What utter drivel.
Your beloved Hitler was a rabid antisemite long before
1933. Already in 1925 -- in "Mein Kampf" -- he expressed
his opinion that Germany should have gassed Jews during WW1.
So, when he was elected, some Jews called to boycott
German goods. If some country would elect as president someone
who called to gas Americans, would you not boycott that country's
goods?
Numerous Muslim leaders called to boycott Danish goods after
the "anti-Muslim cartoons" appeared in a Danish newspaper. Is
that a "declaration of war" against Denmark?
Sheesh. How stupid you people are.
RJ.
-----
Hitler was never elected to the Chancellor post.The Nazis never got
more than 38% of the vote.Hindenburg appointed him chancellor as part
of a backroom deal.
Where have you -- ever -- seen me say he won by a majority? Frankly, Tandy,
what you fail to realize is I don't even like the person in question. He was
an idiot and a moron; he was wrought with multiple insecurities and human
frailties, which his gang of evil backers tried to make up for with classic
Germanic arrogance. The article I posted -- had you read it -- clearly said
he was installed as German chancellor in a coalition form government.
...Duh!
When was the last Israeli prime minister installed in office with a clear
full majority? ...Dummy!
In all the years I've posted here, I've never seen you provoke your own
thought -- not once. Never have you ever stated anything but the obvious and
mundane, knuckle-dragging Judaic party line.You're not only stupid Tandy,
you're a moron for Jewry -- you're their poster boy.
You really should try some mental acuity exercises each day upon waking
up.- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
--------
Post by Jason P
PSST! Here ya go, jackass. See that word "appointed"???
http://www.historyplace.com/worldwar2/holocaust/h-chancl.htm
["Joe Bruno" said... ]
Post by Jason P
Post by Jason P
Hitler was never elected to the Chancellor post.The Nazis never got
more than 38% of the vote.Hindenburg appointed him chancellor as part
of a backroom deal.
[I replied...]
Post by Jason P
Where have you -- ever -- seen me say he won by a majority? Frankly, Tandy,
what you fail to realize is I don't even like the person in question. He was
an idiot and a moron; he was wrought with multiple insecurities and human
frailties, which his gang of evil backers tried to make up for with classic
Germanic arrogance. The article I posted -- had you read it -- clearly said
he was installed as German chancellor in a coalition form government.
...Duh!
[I reiterated...]
Post by Jason P
AGAIN... (for the thick minded)... Where have you -- ever -- seen me say
Hitler won anything by a majority, or any other margin? You are as thick as
a solid brick. Classic Jew stupidity. Taking up with matters not even under
scrutiny, or mentioned.... Law school...huh? ...Sure it wasn't a bad
stretch
in the below 'decks barrel?
Well, come on B'lutto if you're a "law school" graduate, then you can
read -- can't you? Well??

OR

....are you avoiding both of my valid inquiries out of embarassment at not
having read the original article, or the thread, completely enough to follow
it with proper acumen?

You are either STUPID or nuts -- which is it?
Jude Alexander
2010-10-14 11:25:03 UTC
Permalink
Post by Jason P
The Jewish Declaration of War on Nazi Germany
The Economic Boycott of 1933
How Zionists fired the first shots of W.W.II
Article from The Barnes Review, Jan./Feb. 2001, pp. 41-45.
The Barnes Review, 645 Pennsylvania Ave SE, Suite 100, Washington D.C.
20003, USA.
By M. Raphael Johnson, Ph.D.
Long before the Hitler government began restricting the rights of the German
Jews, the leaders of the worldwide Jewish community formally declared war on
the "New Germany" at a time when the U.S. government and even the Jewish
leaders in Germany were urging caution in dealing with the new Hitler
regime.
LOL All along Hitler had the annihilation of Jews on his mind. Hitler
hated the Jews for their religion. Christianity was next if Hitler had been
successful. He wanted a return to Germanic pagan culture where the strong
pushed aside the weak, iows, do unto others before they do unto you.
george
2010-10-14 19:30:26 UTC
Permalink
Post by Jason P
The Jewish Declaration of War on Nazi Germany
    The Economic Boycott of 1933
How Zionists fired the first shots of W.W.II
Wrong!
But then you knew that before you cut and pasted screeds of nonsense
in order to deny the history of the nazi and its genocidal actions
throughout Europe from the 1930s to 1945..
Michael Ragland
2010-10-14 21:24:53 UTC
Permalink
Unfortunately the Jewish Boycott of German goods in March 1933 had no
real power behind it. It did not change Nazi Germany's stance towards
Jews. Jews knew that the appointment of Adolf Hitler as Chancellor of
Germany portended disaster and devastation for Germany's Jews. It's
very disturbing to see these Jews aware of what brutalities and death
faced their people in Germany [and eventually in Nazi occupied Europe]
and being impotent to stop it. The Nazis and the Zionists only
cooperated with each other for a short time and that cooperation was
not the bedrock of forming the state of Israel. That had begun going
all the way back to the Balfour Declaration and even further with
Theodore Herzl.. The Holocaust played a role in Europe's Jews
immigrating to Palestine. The article from the Holocaust denying
"Barnes Review" is rubbish; the Zionists/Jews did not fire the first
shot of WWII, Israel was not founded fraudulently. It is shit just
like you are...

Michael Ragland



According to The Daily Express of London of March 24, 1933, the Jews
had
already launched their boycott against Germany and her elected
government.
The headline read "Judea Declares War on Germany - Jews of All the
World
Unite - Boycott of German Goods - Mass Demonstrations.
Post by Jason P
The Jewish Declaration of War on Nazi Germany
The Economic Boycott of 1933
How Zionists fired the first shots of W.W.II
Article from The Barnes Review, Jan./Feb. 2001, pp. 41-45.
The Barnes Review, 645 Pennsylvania Ave SE, Suite 100, Washington D.C.
20003, USA.
By M. Raphael Johnson, Ph.D.
Long before the Hitler government began restricting the rights of the German
Jews, the leaders of the worldwide Jewish community formally declared war on
the "New Germany" at a time when the U.S. government and even the Jewish
leaders in Germany were urging caution in dealing with the new Hitler
regime.
The war by the international Jewish leadership on Germany not only sparked
definite reprisals by the German government but also set the stage for a
little-known economic and political alliance between the Hitler government
and the leaders of the Zionist movement who hoped that the tension between
the Germans and the Jews would lead to massive emigration to Palestine. In
short, the result was a tactical alliance between the Nazis and the founders
of the modern-day state of Israel - a fact that many today would prefer be
forgotten.
To this day, it is generally (although incorrectly) believed that when Adolf
Hitler was appointed German chancellor in January of 1933, the German
government began policies to suppress the Jews of Germany, including
rounding up of Jews and putting them in concentration camps and launching
campaigns of terror and violence against the domestic Jewish population.
While there were sporadic eruptions of violence against Jews in Germany
after Hitler came to power, this was not officially sanctioned or
encouraged. And the truth is that anti-Jewish sentiments in Germany (or
elsewhere in Europe) were actually nothing new. As all Jewish historians
attest with much fervor, anti-Semitic uprisings of various degrees had been
ever-present in European history.
In any case, in early 1933, Hitler was not the undisputed leader of Germany,
nor did he have full command of the armed forces. Hitler was a major figure
in a coalition government, but he was far from being the government himself.
That was the result of a process of consolidation which evolved later.
Even Germany's Jewish Central Association, known as the Verein, contested
the suggestion (made by some Jewish leaders outside Germany) that the new
government was deliberately provoking anti-Jewish uprisings.
The Verein issued a statement that "the responsible government authorities
[i.e. the Hitler regime] are unaware of the threatening situation," saying,
"we do not believe our German fellow citizens will let themselves be carried
away into committing excesses against the Jews."
Despite this, Jewish leaders in the United States and Britain determined on
their own that it was necessary to launch a war against the Hitler
government.
On March 12, 1933 the American Jewish Congress announced a massive protest
at Madison Square Gardens for March 27. At that time the commander in chief
of the Jewish War Veterans called for an American boycott of German goods.
In the meantime, on March 23, 20,000 Jews protested at New York's City Hall
as rallies were staged outside the North German Lloyd and Hamburg-American
shipping lines and boycotts were mounted against German goods throughout
shops and businesses in New York City.
According to The Daily Express of London of March 24, 1933, the Jews had
already launched their boycott against Germany and her elected government.
The headline read "Judea Declares War on Germany - Jews of All the World
Unite - Boycott of German Goods - Mass Demonstrations." The article
described a forthcoming "holy war" and went on to implore Jews everywhere to
boycott German goods and engage in mass demonstrations against German
economic interests.
--
"The whole of Israel throughout the world is uniting to declare an
economic and financial war on Germany. The appearance of the Swastika as the
symbol of the new Germany has revived the old war symbol of Judas to new
life. Fourteen million Jews scattered over the entire world are tight to
each other as if one man, in order to declare war against the German
persecutors of their fellow believers.
The Jewish wholesaler will quit his house, the banker his stock
exchange, the merchant his business, and the beggar his humble hut, in order
to join the holy war against Hitler's people."
--- Daily Express of London of March 24, 1933
--
The Express said that Germany was "now confronted with an international
boycott of its trade, its finances, and its industry.... In London, New
York, Paris and Warsaw, Jewish businessmen are united to go on an economic
crusade."
The article said "worldwide preparations are being made to organize protest
demonstrations," and reported that "the old and reunited nation of Israel
gets in formation with new and modern weapons to fight out its age old
battle against its persecutors."
This truly could be described as "the first shot fired in the Second World
War."
--
"The war against Germany will be waged by all Jewish communities,
conferences, congresses... by every individual Jew. Thereby the war against
Germany will ideologically enliven and promote our interests, which require
that Germany be wholly destroyed.
The danger for us Jews lies in the whole German people, in Germany as
a whole as well as individually. It must be rendered harmless for all
time.... In this war we Jews have to participate, and this with all the
strength and might we have at our disposal."
--
...The Zionist Association of Germany put out a telegram on the 26th of
March rejecting many of the allegations made against the National Socialists
as "propaganda," "mendacious" and "sensational."
...The Zionist faction had every reason to ensure the permanence of National
Socialist ideology in Germany. Klaus Polkehn, writing in the Journal of
Palestine Studies ("The Secret Contacts: Zionism and Nazi Germany,
1933-1941"; JPS v. 3/4, spring/summer 1976), claims that the moderate
attitude of the Zionists was due to their vested interest in seeing the
financial victory of National Socialism to force immigration to Palestine.
This little-known factor would ultimately come to play a pivotal part in the
relationship between Nazi Germany and the Jews.
In the meantime, though, German Foreign Minister Konstantin von Neurath
--
"As concerns Jews, I can only say that their propagandists abroad are
rendering their co-religionists in Germany no service by giving the German
public, through their distorted and untruthful news about persecution and
torture of Jews, the impression that they actually halt at nothing, not even
at lies and calumny, to fight the present German government."
--
The fledgling Hitler government itself was clearly trying to contain the
growing tension - both within Germany and without. In the United States,
even U.S. Secretary of State Cordell Hull wired Rabbi Stephen Wise of the
--
"Whereas there was for a short time considerable physical mistreatment of
Jews, this phase may be considered virtually terminated.... A stabilization
appears to have been reached in the field of personal mistreatment.... I
feel hopeful that the situation which has caused such widespread concern
throughout this country will soon revert to normal."
--
Despite all this, the leaders of the Jewish community refused to relent. On
March 27 there were simultaneous protest rallies at Madison Square Garden,
in Chicago, Boston, Philadelphia, Baltimore, Cleveland and 70 other
locations. The New York rally was broadcast worldwide. The bottom line is
that "the New Germany" was declared to be an enemy of Jewish interests and
thus needed to be economically strangled. This was before Hitler decided to
boycott Jewish goods.
It was in direct response to this that the German government announced a
one-day boycott of Jewish businesses in Germany on April 1. German
Propaganda Minister Dr. Joseph Goebbels announced that if, after the one-day
boycott, there were no further attacks on Germany, the boycott would be
stopped. Hitler himself responded to the Jewish boycott and the threats in a
speech on March 28 - four days after the original Jewish declaration of
--
"Now that the domestic enemies of the nation have been eliminated by the
Volk itself, what we have long been waiting for will not come to pass.
The Communist and Marxist criminals and their Jewish-intellectual
instigators, who, having made off with their capital stocks across the
border in the nick of time, are now unfolding an unscrupulous, treasonous
campaign of agitation against the German Volk as a whole from there....
Lies and slander of positively hair-raising perversity are being launched
about Germany. Horror stories of dismembered Jewish corpses, gouged out eyes
and hacked off hands are circulating for the purpose of defaming the German
Volk in the world for the second time, just as they had succeeded in doing
once before in 1914."
--
Thus, the fact - one conveniently left out of nearly all history on the
subject - is that Hitler's March 28, 1933 boycott order was in direct
response to the declaration of war on Germany by the worldwide Jewish
leadership just four days earlier. Today, Hitler's boycott order is
described as a naked act of aggression, yet the full circumstances leading
up to his order are seldom described in even the most ponderous and detailed
histories of "the Holocaust".
Not even Saul Friedlander in his otherwise comprehensive overview of German
policy, Nazi Germany and the Jews, mentions the fact that the Jewish
declaration of war and boycott preceded Hitler's speech of March 28, 1933.
Discerning readers would be wise to ask why Friedlander felt this item of
history so irrelevant.
The simple fact is that it was organized Jewry as a political entity - and
not even the German Jewish community per se - that actually initiated the
first shot in the war with Germany.
Germany's response was a defensive - not an offensive - measure. Were that
fact widely known today, it would cast new light on the subsequent events
that ultimately led to the world-wide conflagration that followed.
To understand Hitler's reaction to the Jewish declaration of war, it is
vital to understand the critical state of the German economy at the time. In
1933, the German economy was in a shambles. Some 3 million Germans were on
public assistance with a total of 6 million unemployed. Hyper-inflation had
destroyed the economic vitality of the German nation. Furthermore, the
anti-German propaganda pouring out of the global press strengthened the
resolve of Germany's enemies, especially the Poles and their hawkish
military high command.
The Jewish leaders were not bluffing. The boycott was an act of war not
solely in metaphor: it was a means, well crafted, to destroy Germany as a
political, social and economic entity. The long term purpose of the Jewish
boycott against Germany was to bankrupt her with respect to the reparation
payments imposed on Germany after World War I and to keep Germany
demilitarized and vulnerable.
The boycott, in fact, was quite crippling to Germany. Jewish scholars such
as Edwin Black have reported that, in response to the boycott, German
exports were cut by 10 percent, and that many were demanding seizing German
assets in foreign countries (Edwin Black, The Transfer Agreement - The
Untold Story of the Secret Pact between the Third Reich and Jewish
Palestine, New York, 1984).
The attacks on Germany did not cease. The worldwide Jewish leadership became
ever the more belligerent and worked itself into a frenzy. An International
Jewish Boycott Conference was held in Amsterdam to coordinate the ongoing
boycott campaign. It was held under the auspices of the self-styled World
Jewish Economic Federation, of which famous New York City attorney and
longtime political power broker, Samuel Untermyer, was elected president.
Upon returning to the United States in the wake of the conference, Untermyer
delivered a speech over WABC Radio (New York), a transcript of which was
printed in The New York Times on August 7, 1933.
Untermyer's inflammatory oratory called for a "sacred war" against Germany,
making the flat-out allegation that Germany was engaged in a plan to
--
"...Germany [has] been converted from a nation of culture into a veritable
hell of cruel and savage beasts.
We owe it not only to our persecuted brethren but to the entire world to now
strike in self-defense a blow that will free humanity from a repetition of
this incredible outrage....
Now or never must all the nations of the earth make common cause against
the... slaughter, starvation and annihilation... fiendish torture, cruelty
and persecution that are being inflicted day by day upon these men, women
and children....
When the tale is told... the world will confront a picture so fearful in its
barbarous cruelty that the hell of war and the alleged Belgian atrocities
pale into insignificance as compared to this devilishly, deliberately,
cold-bloodedly planned and already partially executed campaign for the
extermination of a proud, gentle, loyal, law-abiding people...
The Jews are the aristocrats of the world. From time immemorial they have
been persecuted and have seen their persecutors come and go. They alone have
survived. And so will history repeat itself, but that furnishes no reason
why we should permit this reversion of a once great nation to the Dark Ages
or fail to rescue these 600,000 human souls from the tortures of hell....
...What we are proposing and have already gone far toward doing, is to
prosecute a purely defensive economic boycott that will undermine the Hitler
regime and bring the German people to their senses by destroying their
export trade on which their very existence depends.
...We propose to and are organizing world opinion to express itself in the
only way Germany can be made to understand...."
--
Untermyer then proceeded to provide his listeners with a wholly fraudulent
history of the circumstances of the German boycott and how it originated. He
also proclaimed that the Germans were bent on a plan to "exterminate the
--
"The Hitler regime originated and are fiendishly prosecuting their boycott
to exterminate the Jews by placarding Jewish shops, warning Germans against
dealing with them, by imprisoning Jewish shopkeepers and parading them
through the streets by the hundreds under guard of Nazi troops for the sole
crime of being Jews, by ejecting them from the learned professions in which
many of them had attained eminence, by excluding their children from the
schools, their men from the labor unions, closing against them every avenue
of livelihood, locking them in vile concentration camps and starving and
torturing them without cause and resorting to every other conceivable form
of torture, inhuman beyond conception, until suicide has become their only
means of escape, and all solely because they are or their remote ancestors
were Jews, and all with the avowed object of exterminating them."
--
Untermyer concluded his largely fantastic and hysterical address by
declaring that with the support of "Christian friends... we will drive the
last nail in the coffin of bigotry and fanaticism...."
That his allegations against Germany were made long before even Jewish
historians today claim there were any gas chambers or even a plan to
"exterminate" the Jews, displays the nature of the propaganda campaign
confronting Germany.
However, during this same period there were some unusual developments at
work: The spring of 1933 also witnessed the beginning of a period of private
cooperation between the German government and the Zionist movement in
Germany and Palestine (and actually worldwide) to increase the flow of
German-Jewish immigrants and capital to Palestine.
The modern-day supporters of Zionist Israel and many historians have
succeeded in keeping this Nazi-Zionist pact a secret to the general public
for decades and while most Americans have no concept of the possibility that
there could have been outright collaboration between the Nazi leadership and
the founders of what became the state of Israel, the truth has begun to
emerge.
Dissident Jewish writer Lenni Brennar's Zionism In the Age of the Dictators,
published by a small press and not given the publicity it deserves by the
so-called "mainstream" media (which is otherwise obsessed with the Holocaust
era), was perhaps the first major endeavor in this realm.
In response to Brennar and others, the Zionist reaction has usually
consisted of declarations that their collaboration with Nazi Germany was
undertaken solely to save the lives of Jews. But the collaboration was all
the more remarkable because it took place at a time when many Jews and
Jewish organizations demanded a boycott of Germany.
To the Zionist leaders, Hitler's assumption of power held out the
possibility of a flow of immigrants to Palestine. Previously, the majority
of German Jews, who identified themselves as Germans, had little sympathy
with the Zionist cause of promoting the ingathering of world Jewry to
Palestine. But the Zionists saw that only the anti-Semitic Hitler was likely
to push the anti-Zionist German Jews into the arms of Zionism.
For all the modern-day wailing by worldwide supporters of Israel (not to
mention the Israelis themselves) about "the Holocaust", they neglect to
mention that making the situation in Germany as uncomfortable for the Jews
as possible - in cooperation with German National Socialism - was part of
the plan.
This was the genesis of the so-called Transfer Agreement, the agreement
between Zionist Jews and the National Socialist government to transfer
German Jewry to Palestine.
According to Jewish historian Walter Laqueur and many others, German Jews
were far from convinced that immigration to Palestine was the answer.
Furthermore, although the majority of German Jews refused to consider the
Zionists as their political leaders, it is clear that Hitler protected and
cooperated with the Zionists for the purposes of implementing the final
solution: the mass transfer of Jews to the Middle East.
Edwin Black, in his massive tome The Transfer Agreement (Macmillan, 1984),
stated that although most Jews did not want to flee to Palestine at all, due
to the Zionist movement's influence within Nazi Germany a Jew's best chance
of getting out of Germany was by emigrating to Palestine. In other words,
the Transfer Agreement itself mandated that Jewish capital could only to go
Palestine.
Thus, according to the Zionists, a Jew could leave Germany only if he went
to the Levant.
The primary difficulty with the Transfer Agreement (or even the idea of such
an agreement) was that the English [!!!; Scriptorium] were demanding, as a
condition of immigration, that each immigrant pay 1,000 pounds sterling upon
arrival in Haifa or elsewhere. The difficulty was that such hard currency
was nearly impossible to come by in a cash-strapped and radically
inflationary Germany. This was the main idea behind the final Transfer
--
"A large German bank would freeze funds paid in by immigrants in blocked
accounts for German exporters, while a bank in Palestine would control the
sale of German goods to Palestine, thereby providing the immigrants with the
necessary foreign currency on the spot. Sam Cohen, co-owner of Hanoaiah Ltd.
and initiator of the transfer endeavors, was however subjected to
long-lasting objections from his own people and finally had to concede that
such a transfer agreement could only be concluded on a much higher level
with a bank of its own rather than that of a private company. The renowned
Anglo-Palestine Bank in London would be included in this transfer deal and
create a trust company for [this] purpose."
--
Of course, this is of major historical importance in dealing with the
relationship between Zionism and National Socialism in Germany in the 1930s.
The relationship was not one merely of mutual interest and political
favoritism on the part of Hitler, but a close financial relationship with
--
"It was one thing for the Zionists to subvert the anti-Nazi boycott.
Zionism needed to transfer out the capital of German Jews, and merchandise
was the only available medium. But soon Zionist leaders understood that the
success of the future Jewish Palestinian economy would be inextricably bound
up with the survival of the Nazi economy. So the Zionist leadership was
compelled to go further. The German economy would have to be safeguarded,
stabilized, and if necessary reinforced. Hence, the Nazi party and the
Zionist organizers shared a common stake in the recovery of Germany."
--
Thus one sees a radical fissure in world Jewry around 1933 and beyond.
There were, first, the non-Zionist Jews (specifically the World Jewish
Congress founded in 1933), who, on the one hand, demanded the boycott and
eventual destruction of Germany. Black notes that many of these people were
not just in New York and Amsterdam, but a major source for this also came
from Palestine proper.
On the other hand, one can see the judicious use of such feelings by the
Zionists for the sake of eventual resettlement in Palestine. In other words,
it can be said (and Black does hint at this) that Zionism believed that,
since Jews would be moving to the Levant, capital flight would be necessary
for any new economy to function.
The result was the understanding that Zionism would have to ally itself
with National Socialism, so that the German government would not impede the
flow of Jewish capital out of the country.
It served the Zionist interests at the time that Jews be loud in their
denunciations of German practices against the Jews to scare them into the
Levant, but, on the other hand, Laqueur states that "The Zionists became
motivated not to jeopardize the German economy or currency." In other words,
the Zionist leadership of the Jewish Diaspora was one of subterfuge and
underhandedness, with only the advent of German hostility towards Jewry
convincing the world's Jews that immigration was the only escape.
The fact is that the ultimate establishment of the state of Israel was
based on fraud. The Zionists did not represent anything more than a small
minority of German Jews in 1933.
On the one hand, the Zionist fathers of Israel wanted loud denunciations
of Germany's "cruelties" to the world's Jews while at the same time
demanding moderation so that the National Socialist government would remain
stable, financially and politically. Thus Zionism boycotted the boycott.
For all intents and purposes, the National Socialist government was the
best thing to happen to Zionism in its history, for it "proved" to many Jews
that Europeans were irredeemably anti-Jewish and that Palestine was the only
answer: Zionism came to represent the overwhelming majority of Jews solely
by trickery and cooperation with Adolf Hitler.
For the Zionists, both the denunciations of German policies towards Jews
(to keep Jews frightened), plus the reinvigoration of the German economy
(for the sake of final resettlement) was imperative for the Zionist
movement. Ironically, today the Zionist leaders of Israel complain bitterly
about the horrific and inhuman regime of the National Socialists. So the
fraud continues.
--- The Barnes Review, 645 Pennsylvania Ave SE, Suite 100, Washington
D.C. 20003, USA.
--
I Like the Truth....
"Why Johnny Ringo! I'll be your 'huckleberry...' say when...!"
-Doc Holiday (in movie "Tombstone") to cowboy-outlaw Johnny Ringo
--
Force, no matter how concealed, begets resistance. - Lakota Sioux proverb
Listening to a liar is like drinking warm water. - Native American Unknown
A brave man dies but once, a coward many times. - Native American Unknown
--
They deem him their worst enemy who tells them the truth.
-Plato
--
"I've earned everything I've got."
- Richard M. Nixon
Jason P
2010-10-15 15:21:56 UTC
Permalink
Post by Michael Ragland
Unfortunately the Jewish Boycott of German goods in March 1933 had no
real power behind it. It did not change Nazi Germany's stance towards
Jews. Jews knew that the appointment of Adolf Hitler as Chancellor of
Germany portended disaster and devastation for Germany's Jews. It's
very disturbing to see these Jews aware of what brutalities and death
faced their people in Germany [and eventually in Nazi occupied Europe]
and being impotent to stop it. The Nazis and the Zionists only
cooperated with each other for a short time and that cooperation was
not the bedrock of forming the state of Israel. That had begun going
all the way back to the Balfour Declaration and even further with
Theodore Herzl.. The Holocaust played a role in Europe's Jews
immigrating to Palestine. The article from the Holocaust denying
"Barnes Review" is rubbish; the Zionists/Jews did not fire the first
shot of WWII, Israel was not founded fraudulently. It is shit just
like you are...
Michael Ragland
[...]

Unfortunately, for the Jews of Europe, they tried to bring down a German
coalition government with that same boycott. The rest is history and a
collection of phony human soap and goatskin lampshades in some dark and
dusty "holocaust" museum display.

You're an obsessive-compulsive, cut-and-past, moron, Ragu!
mirjam
2010-10-15 15:51:22 UTC
Permalink
Post by Jason P
Unfortunately, for the Jews of Europe, they tried to bring down a German
coalition government with that same boycott. The rest is history and a
collection of phony human soap and goatskin lampshades in some dark and
dusty "holocaust" museum display.
You're an obsessive-compulsive, cut-and-past,  moron, Ragu!
My post about the WW l
shows that you just fabricate/ past and glue Non existing stories.
mirjjam
Jason P
2010-10-15 16:00:18 UTC
Permalink
Post by Jason P
Unfortunately, for the Jews of Europe, they tried to bring down a German
coalition government with that same boycott. The rest is history and a
collection of phony human soap and goatskin lampshades in some dark and
dusty "holocaust" museum display.
You're an obsessive-compulsive, cut-and-past, moron, Ragu!
-------
Post by Jason P
My post about the WW l
shows that you just fabricate/ past and glue Non existing stories.
mirjjam
Oh, go stuff it you old lying shit!
NefeshBarYochai
2010-10-15 17:54:58 UTC
Permalink
Post by Jason P
Post by Jason P
Unfortunately, for the Jews of Europe, they tried to bring down a German
coalition government with that same boycott. The rest is history and a
collection of phony human soap and goatskin lampshades in some dark and
dusty "holocaust" museum display.
You're an obsessive-compulsive, cut-and-past, moron, Ragu!
-------
Post by Jason P
My post about the WW l
shows that you just fabricate/ past and glue Non existing stories.
mirjjam
Oh, go stuff it you old lying shit!
You need a sock in your homosexual mouth you undesirable asshole.
Gord McFee
2010-10-18 01:00:33 UTC
Permalink
Post by Jason P
Post by Jason P
Unfortunately, for the Jews of Europe, they tried to bring down a German
coalition government with that same boycott. The rest is history and a
collection of phony human soap and goatskin lampshades in some dark and
dusty "holocaust" museum display.
You're an obsessive-compulsive, cut-and-past, moron, Ragu!
-------
Post by Jason P
My post about the WW l
shows that you just fabricate/ past and glue Non existing stories.
mirjjam
Oh, go stuff it you old lying shit!
Why are you so frightened of her, Jason? It is just Jewish women that
terrify you or is it all women?
--
Gord McFee
I'll write no line before its time

Visit the Holocaust History Project
http://www.holocaust-history.org
Joe Bruno
2010-10-18 01:10:48 UTC
Permalink
Post by Jason P
Post by Jason P
Unfortunately, for the Jews of Europe, they tried to bring down a German
coalition government with that same boycott. The rest is history and a
collection of phony human soap and goatskin lampshades in some dark and
dusty "holocaust" museum display.
You're an obsessive-compulsive, cut-and-past, moron, Ragu!
-------
Post by Jason P
My post about the WW l
shows that you just fabricate/ past and glue Non existing stories.
mirjjam
Oh, go stuff it you old lying shit!
Why are you so frightened of her, Jason?  It is just Jewish women that
terrify you or is it all women?
It is quite serous. The word on the street is that he has begun doing
his drinking in gay bars.

NefeshBarYochai
2010-10-15 17:54:16 UTC
Permalink
Post by mirjam
Post by Jason P
Unfortunately, for the Jews of Europe, they tried to bring down a German
coalition government with that same boycott. The rest is history and a
collection of phony human soap and goatskin lampshades in some dark and
dusty "holocaust" museum display.
You're an obsessive-compulsive, cut-and-past,  moron, Ragu!
My post about the WW l
shows that you just fabricate/ past and glue Non existing stories.
mirjjam
He does that because he's a candyass that jacks his meat.
Jason P
2010-10-16 02:36:21 UTC
Permalink
Post by mirjam
Post by Jason P
Unfortunately, for the Jews of Europe, they tried to bring down a German
coalition government with that same boycott. The rest is history and a
collection of phony human soap and goatskin lampshades in some dark and
dusty "holocaust" museum display.
You're an obsessive-compulsive, cut-and-past, moron, Ragu!
My post about the WW l
shows that you just fabricate/ past and glue Non existing stories.
mirjjam
-----
Post by mirjam
He does that because he's a candyass that jacks his meat.
So... was that supposed to make me angry?
DoD
2010-10-16 05:02:33 UTC
Permalink
Post by Jason P
Post by mirjam
Post by Jason P
Unfortunately, for the Jews of Europe, they tried to bring down a German
coalition government with that same boycott. The rest is history and a
collection of phony human soap and goatskin lampshades in some dark and
dusty "holocaust" museum display.
You're an obsessive-compulsive, cut-and-past, moron, Ragu!
My post about the WW l
shows that you just fabricate/ past and glue Non existing stories.
mirjjam
-----
Post by mirjam
He does that because he's a candyass that jacks his meat.
So... was that supposed to make me angry?
Why would it? You are just as immature...
Joe Bruno
2010-10-16 09:44:36 UTC
Permalink
Post by mirjam
Post by Jason P
Unfortunately, for the Jews of Europe, they tried to bring down a German
coalition government with that same boycott. The rest is history and a
collection of phony human soap and goatskin lampshades in some dark and
dusty "holocaust" museum display.
You're an obsessive-compulsive, cut-and-past,  moron, Ragu!
My post about the WW l
shows that you just fabricate/ past and glue Non existing stories.
mirjjam
He goes beyond that. Without knowing anything about my personal
history, he went into a tirade about what I did in the Navy
30 years ago. Of course, it was full of nonsense.

This cuckoo bird thinks he is embarrassing me by telling silly lies
about me. saying things he has no way of knowing about.

I don't think he's very bright.
Jason P
2010-10-16 11:08:10 UTC
Permalink
Post by mirjam
Post by Jason P
Unfortunately, for the Jews of Europe, they tried to bring down a German
coalition government with that same boycott. The rest is history and a
collection of phony human soap and goatskin lampshades in some dark and
dusty "holocaust" museum display.
You're an obsessive-compulsive, cut-and-past, moron, Ragu!
My post about the WW l
shows that you just fabricate/ past and glue Non existing stories.
mirjjam
------
Post by mirjam
He goes beyond that. Without knowing anything about my personal
history, he went into a tirade about what I did in the Navy
30 years ago. Of course, it was full of nonsense.
This cuckoo bird thinks he is embarrassing me by telling silly lies
about me. saying things he has no way of knowing about.
I don't think he's very bright.
This "cuckoo bird" just reiterated what you had said yourself, in a heated
debate, or what ultimately came of it. Why don't you share how the
government confiscated your firearms, B'luto? Tell us all about the garden
deluxe Mexican neighborhood you live in near San Diego....?

I'm sure idiots like Mirjam will eat it up!
Continue reading on narkive:
Loading...